Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: WIP reinvigoration of package management tooling #1729

Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

butler54
Copy link
Collaborator

@butler54 butler54 commented Oct 16, 2024

Types of changes

  • Hot fix (emergency fix and release)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Documentation (change which affects the documentation site)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Release (develop -> main)

Quality assurance (all should be covered).

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • Documentation for my change is up to date?
  • My PR meets testing requirements.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • All commits are signed-off.

Summary

This is a reinvigoration of the package management for compliance trestle to be the latest possible.

It also eliminates some dependencies which don't have support.

Closes:

Closes: #1728

Key links:

Before you merge

  • Ensure it is a 'squash commit' if not a release.
  • Ensure CI is currently passing
  • Check sonar. If you are working for a fork a maintainer will reach out, if required.

@butler54
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Putting here for some visibility. Not quite ready for review yet.

Signed-off-by: Chris Butler <[email protected]>
@butler54
Copy link
Collaborator Author

butler54 commented Nov 8, 2024

@jpower432 - any thoughts on hatch vs flit / poetry? I'm going to hold off until we have a clear path forward.

@jpower432
Copy link
Member

@butler54 I have used poetry in other projects, but since the design includes dependency locking, I think it might not be best for our use case given #1715. hatch seems like is would be easier to use across the different project types that we have.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Testing setup for isolated networks
2 participants