Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: explain code quality checks in contribution guide #1748

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion CONTRIBUTING.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ In trestle's CI environment this results in the following rules:
1. Trestle will release on demand the default approach for a hot fix should be to merge into `develop`, followed by releasing to `main`, unless this will release functionality that is not ready.
1. Each feature/fix/chore (PR into develop) be represented by a single commit into develop / main with a coherent title (in the PR).
1. The trestle preference for doing this is to use squash merge functionality when merging a PR into develop.
1. Developers *MUST* pass the required CI checks for each PR.
1. Developers *MUST* pass the required CI checks for each PR. The checks enforce code quality with a format checker (yapf) and linter (flake8).
1. Developers are encouraged to use GitHub's automated merge process where possible to keep the number of active PR's low.

### Merge details for committers:
Expand Down
Loading