Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show last chart data as non-hover price on token info page #4016

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stage
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fabryscript
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
osmosis-frontend ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 17, 2024 4:44pm
4 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
osmosis-frontend-datadog ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 17, 2024 4:44pm
osmosis-frontend-dev ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 17, 2024 4:44pm
osmosis-frontend-edgenet ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 17, 2024 4:44pm
osmosis-testnet ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 17, 2024 4:44pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 eslint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

packages/web/components/pages/asset-info-page/chart.tsx

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.50.0

ESLint couldn't find the config "next/core-web-vitals" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct.

The config "next/core-web-vitals" was referenced from the config file in "/packages/web/.eslintrc.json".

If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the ChartHeader component within the AssetPriceChart in the chart.tsx file. The changes primarily affect the calculation of data in the hoverData memoization. The logic for handling price data has been simplified by directly using the last chart data's close value, removing the previous conditional check that relied on marketAsset.currentPrice. The memoization dependencies have been updated accordingly to reflect this change.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/web/components/pages/asset-info-page/chart.tsx Modified hoverData memoization logic to simplify price data calculation, removing dependency on marketAsset.currentPrice

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5105742 and 2b5066c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/web/components/pages/asset-info-page/chart.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/web/components/pages/asset-info-page/chart.tsx (2)

191-191: LGTM! Simplified price display logic

The change correctly implements the PR objective by consistently showing the last chart data price instead of falling back to market price. The code is more maintainable with simplified logic.


191-191: Verify price consistency with market data

Since we're now always using chart data instead of potentially fresher market prices, please verify that this doesn't create noticeable price discrepancies in the UI, especially during high volatility periods.

✅ Verification successful

Price consistency is maintained through synchronized data sources

Based on the code analysis, the change is safe because:

  1. In use-historical-and-depth-data.ts, lastChartData is actually derived from currentPrice for concentrated pools, ensuring price consistency
  2. The chart component uses this synchronized data source, where lastChartData.close will always reflect the current pool price
  3. The price display logic in asset info components uses the same underlying data model
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any price comparison or validation logic in the codebase
# that might be affected by this change

# Look for files comparing chart prices with market prices
rg -l "currentPrice|lastChartData.*close" --type ts --type tsx

# Look for price-related test files
fd "price.*test\.(ts|tsx)$"

Length of output: 122


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any price comparison or validation logic in the codebase
# Let's try with ripgrep without file type restrictions and focus on the patterns

# Look for files comparing chart prices with market prices
rg -l "currentPrice|lastChartData\.close"

# Let's also check for any price validation or comparison logic
rg -l "validatePrice|comparePrice|priceComparison"

# And check for any test files related to asset info or price
find . -type f -name "*price*test*" -o -name "*asset*test*"

Length of output: 2475


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the specific usage of lastChartData and price comparisons in relevant files

# Check the context of lastChartData usage in the chart component
rg -B 3 -A 3 "lastChartData.*close" "packages/web/components/pages/asset-info-page/chart.tsx"

# Check how prices are used in asset info components
rg -B 3 -A 3 "currentPrice|lastChartData" "packages/web/components/table/asset-info.tsx"

# Check price-related logic in historical data hook
rg -B 3 -A 3 "currentPrice|lastChartData" "packages/web/hooks/ui-config/use-historical-and-depth-data.ts"

Length of output: 2687


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

data =
marketAsset?.currentPrice?.toDec() ??
new Dec(assetInfoConfig.lastChartData?.close ?? 0);
data = new Dec(assetInfoConfig.lastChartData?.close ?? 0);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have we verified whether this price reflects the most current value? I’m concerned that discrepancies might appear throughout the app

Copy link
Collaborator

@EnricoBarbieri1997 EnricoBarbieri1997 Dec 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The difference between the two is noticeable but small.
There has been a discussion going on with Numia talking about that. As of now data from Numia and SQS differ so the last point on the chart and the price displayed when no hover is performed are different and inconsistent. They tried to make the SQS value the same as Numia but they ultimately decided to just use the Numia value in this page

Copy link
Collaborator

@JoseRFelix JoseRFelix Dec 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should investigate this further because the currentPrice is sourced from Numia instead of SQS. Changing this might introduce risk since more features in the DEX rely on the currentPrice rather than the last chart value. I’d like to avoid potential discrepancies, especially since we recently resolved a related bug in #4015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants