You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Do you support CentOS 8 atm? I followed the instructions for setting up the yum repo and got the following...
# wget -O /etc/yum.repos.d/overviewer.repo https://overviewer.org/rpms/overviewer.repo
# yum install Minecraft-Overviewer
DigitalOcean Agent 93 kB/s | 3.3 kB 00:00
Minecraft-Overviewer - 8 - x86_64 3.5 kB/s | 153 B 00:00
Failed to download metadata for repo 'overviewer'
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'overviewer'
I also tried installing the rpm directly (listed as for "CentOS 7+" - note the plus) and got...
# yum install https://overviewer.org/builds/centos7-64/109/overviewer-0.15.30.rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:29 ago on Tue 21 Apr 2020 09:06:44 AM UTC.
overviewer-0.15.30.rpm 2.0 MB/s | 410 kB 00:00
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides python36-numpy needed by Minecraft-Overviewer-0.15.30-1.el7.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
Is compiling from source likely to work for me on CentOS 8?
Also in the overviewer.repo file, given that you are not using gpg, why are using http:// in the baseurl instead of https://, given that the packages appear to be accessible over https too? Doesn't this make MitM attacks more likely?
Thank in advance, Ben
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Do you support CentOS 8 atm? I followed the instructions for setting up the yum repo and got the following...
I also tried installing the rpm directly (listed as for "CentOS 7+" - note the plus) and got...
Is compiling from source likely to work for me on CentOS 8?
Also in the overviewer.repo file, given that you are not using gpg, why are using http:// in the baseurl instead of https://, given that the packages appear to be accessible over https too? Doesn't this make MitM attacks more likely?
Thank in advance, Ben
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: