Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CentOS 8 support? #1757

Closed
BenKennish opened this issue Apr 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

CentOS 8 support? #1757

BenKennish opened this issue Apr 21, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@BenKennish
Copy link

BenKennish commented Apr 21, 2020

Do you support CentOS 8 atm? I followed the instructions for setting up the yum repo and got the following...

# wget -O /etc/yum.repos.d/overviewer.repo https://overviewer.org/rpms/overviewer.repo
# yum install Minecraft-Overviewer
DigitalOcean Agent                                                                                                                93 kB/s | 3.3 kB     00:00
Minecraft-Overviewer - 8 - x86_64                                                                                                3.5 kB/s | 153  B     00:00
Failed to download metadata for repo 'overviewer'
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'overviewer'

I also tried installing the rpm directly (listed as for "CentOS 7+" - note the plus) and got...

# yum install https://overviewer.org/builds/centos7-64/109/overviewer-0.15.30.rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:29 ago on Tue 21 Apr 2020 09:06:44 AM UTC.
overviewer-0.15.30.rpm                                                                                                          2.0 MB/s | 410 kB     00:00
Error:
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python36-numpy needed by Minecraft-Overviewer-0.15.30-1.el7.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

Is compiling from source likely to work for me on CentOS 8?

Also in the overviewer.repo file, given that you are not using gpg, why are using http:// in the baseurl instead of https://, given that the packages appear to be accessible over https too? Doesn't this make MitM attacks more likely?

Thank in advance, Ben

@BenKennish
Copy link
Author

BenKennish commented Apr 21, 2020

Nvm.. this is a duplicate of #1677

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant