Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Jason Instead of JSX #179
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Use Jason Instead of JSX #179
Changes from all commits
0f2d587
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added this for two reasons:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👋 @jherdman
Sorry to bother you over an old PR. But I've been looking at it and it seems like the request here is different (according to a rexbug trace):
whereas in the failing test it's
and the
:cacerts
option is what makes it fail.In non-strict mode
jsx
seems to escape invalid bytes with�
:https://github.com/talentdeficit/jsx/blob/1d3407aa9752430ec0a06111ac1b046ffafdca22/src/jsx_parser.erl#L608C7-L608C14
Here's what the encoded request for the failing test looks like. This is a data loss, so I wonder if
request.options
is actually used anywhere inExVCR
's logic.Anyway, we can preprocess the data in the
Jason
impl forExVCR.Request
to escape all invalid bytes inoptions
with�
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems to work:
Resulting JSON: https://gist.github.com/ruslandoga/be54ef0cbcd69bdb66b01a5e9bd7a062
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it's OK, I'll try to finish up this PR in #206