Remove Bundler 2.0 restriction #51
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Allows Bundler >= 2.0 in addition to the existing set (' ~> 1.16') by removing the upper limit on Bundler version.
Closed
|
Any chance to get that merged? |
|
Closing as @piotrmurach is working on a better approach ❤️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allows Bundler >= 2.0 in addition to the existing set (' ~> 1.16') by removing the upper limit on Bundler version.
Describe the change
This PR resolves #50 by updating the Gemfile to allow Bundler >=2.0.
Why are we doing this?
We're doing this to allow TTY to be used with modern versions of Bundler.
Drawbacks
None that I could see.
Requirements
Put an X between brackets on each line if you have done the item:
[x] Tests written & passing locally? (Tested by creating project using local fork of gem)
[] Code style checked?
[] Rebased with
masterbranch?[] Documentaion updated?