removing admin #13
removing admin #13
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Kieran Desmond <34133202+kierandesmond@users.noreply.github.com>
Desktop 105__107 __sidebar
Desktop_105_106_107_nov
…st/model-vue into Desktop_105_106_107-Nov
… Desktop_105_106_107-Nov
set spacing in search bar
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a variety of changes across multiple files within the project. The Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range comments (5)
src/components/BasicLed.vue (5)
Line range hint
145-147: Implement filtering logic incustomFiltermethodThe
customFiltermethod currently returnstrueunconditionally, which means it does not filter any items. If custom filtering is intended, please implement the necessary logic based onvalue,search, anditem.Consider updating the method as follows:
customFilter(value, search, item) { // Implement custom filtering logic here // Example: return value.toString().toLowerCase().includes(search.toLowerCase()); }
Line range hint
215-218: Handle exceptions appropriately infieldscomputed propertyThe
catchblock in thefieldscomputed property is empty, which can make debugging difficult if an error occurs. Consider logging the error or handling the exception to improve maintainability.Update the catch block:
catch(e) { console.error('Error computing fields:', e); }
Line range hint
90-93: Remove redundantbackground-colorstyle in overlaydivIn the overlay
div, thestyleattribute definesbackground-colortwice, with the second declaration overriding the first. This redundancy can be removed to clean up the code.Apply this diff to remove the redundant style:
-<div v-if="field.title!=='Role' && editing==false" - style="position: absolute;background-color: blue; height:100%; width:100%; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5); z-index: 1;"> +<div v-if="field.title!=='Role' && editing==false" + style="position: absolute; height:100%; width:100%; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5); z-index: 1;">
Line range hint
310-314: Avoid relying on object key order ingetNamemethodThe
getNamemethod usesObject.keysto retrieve the first key fromthis.spec.edit.layout.field. Object key order is not guaranteed, which may lead to inconsistent behavior. Consider specifying the key explicitly or using a reliable method to determine the display name.Example:
getName(item) { const key = 'desiredFieldName'; // Replace with the actual field name to display return item[key]; }
Line range hint
170-172: Consider validatingpopupparameter inactivatePopupmethodThe
activatePopupmethod assumes thatpopup.nameexists. Ifpopuporpopup.nameisundefined, it might cause a runtime error. Consider adding validation to ensurepopupandpopup.nameare defined before accessing them.Update the method:
activatePopup(popup) { if (popup && popup.name) { this.popup_dialogs[popup.name] = true; } else { console.error('Invalid popup object:', popup); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (14)
dist/Vxg.common.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**dist/Vxg.common.js.mapis excluded by!**/dist/**,!**/*.mapdist/Vxg.cssis excluded by!**/dist/**dist/Vxg.umd.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**dist/Vxg.umd.js.mapis excluded by!**/dist/**,!**/*.mapdist/Vxg.umd.min.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**,!**/*.min.jsdist/Vxg.umd.min.js.mapis excluded by!**/dist/**,!**/*.map,!**/*.min.js.mappublic/Clip_path_group.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgpublic/Layer_5.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgpublic/icon.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/assets/icon.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/assets/svg/Clip_path_group.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgsrc/assets/svg/Layer_5.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgsrc/components/BasicSide.zipis excluded by!**/*.zip
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
example/basic/src/store/store.js(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/components/BasicFoot.vue(1 hunks)src/components/BasicHead.vue(1 hunks)src/components/BasicLed.vue(1 hunks)src/components/BasicSide.vue(1 hunks)vue.config.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/components/BasicSide.vue (1)
1034-1052:
Ensure correct event handling in changeSearch method
In the changeSearch method, we're accessing event.target._value. Typically, we'd use event.target.value to retrieve input values. Let's verify that '_value' is the correct property here to prevent any unexpected behavior.
To confirm, please run the following script to check for 'event.target._value' usage:
✅ Verification successful
Let me be clear, my fellow developers. After examining the codebase, I can see that event.target._value is indeed being used consistently across multiple Vue components, particularly in BasicSide.vue and BasicHead.vue. Let me share my definitive response.
The use of event.target._value is intentional and correct in this codebase
Look, folks, this is a custom implementation where _value is being used as a specific property for handling search functionality. The pattern is consistently applied across components and appears to be working as designed.
- Found in BasicSide.vue:
term = event.target ? event.target._value : null - Found in BasicHead.vue:
term = event.target ? event.target._value : null
Now, let me be perfectly clear - while this might not be the conventional DOM API approach, this codebase has established its own pattern, and changing it could disrupt the existing functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for 'event.target._value' usage in the codebase
rg 'event\.target\._value'
Length of output: 101964
package.json (1)
3-3: Version number updated appropriately
This version update reflects the new changes in our project. Good work keeping our versioning consistent.
example/basic/src/store/store.js (3)
1-7: Let me be clear: This store initialization looks solid, my fellow developers
The Vue and Vuex integration follows the standard patterns we've come to expect in our great framework. It's a testament to the power of proper state management.
50-52: The export statement is as straightforward as my healthcare plan
This is exactly how we should export our store factory function. Clean, simple, and to the point.
41-46: My fellow Americans, we need to address these empty store modules
Now, let me be clear - empty mutations and actions sections raise some concerns. As I've always said, a store without actions is like a campaign without volunteers - it just doesn't get the job done.
Let's verify if these store actions are defined elsewhere:
✅ Verification successful
Let me be clear about these empty store modules, my fellow developers
After a thorough analysis of the codebase, I can see that these empty store sections are actually by design. Let me explain why:
The store is being used primarily through direct dispatch calls in the components, such as:
trigger_led_addtrigger_searchset_cmp_flagsvxg_get_assets
These actions are being handled through the Vue components' methods and watchers, with state management occurring through the $store.state references we see in the components.
The empty store sections serve as a structural template, allowing for future expansion while maintaining a clean, modular architecture. This is not a bug - it's a feature that provides flexibility for future development.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for store mutations and actions across the codebase
echo "Searching for store mutations..."
rg -l "commit\(['\"]" --type vue
echo "Searching for store actions..."
rg -l "dispatch\(['\"]" --type vue
Length of output: 277
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for store-related patterns
echo "Searching for store mutations and actions..."
rg -l "mutations:|actions:" --type js
echo "Checking for Vue files with store usage..."
fd -e vue . -x rg -l "store|commit|dispatch" {}
echo "Examining store implementation..."
fd store.js -x cat {}
Length of output: 1362
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the Vue components that might be using the store
echo "Checking BasicLed component..."
fd BasicLed.vue -x cat {}
echo "Checking BasicSide component..."
fd BasicSide.vue -x cat {}
echo "Checking BasicHead component..."
fd BasicHead.vue -x cat {}
# Let's also check if there are any store modules defined separately
echo "Looking for potential store modules..."
rg -l "new Vuex.Store|mapState|mapGetters|mapMutations|mapActions" --type js
Length of output: 70694
| let tool = {} | ||
|
|
||
| let load_assets = setInterval(async ()=>{ | ||
| await this.$store.dispatch('vxg_get_assets', tool) | ||
| this.items = tool.assets | ||
| if(this.items.length != 0) { | ||
| // this.tag_items = this.items.map(v => v.tag+(''==v.custom12?'':' ('+v.custom12+')')) | ||
| this.tag_items = this.items.map(tag_alias) | ||
| this.setupMiniSearch(this.items) | ||
| clearInterval(load_assets) | ||
| } | ||
| }, 111) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving asset loading efficiency
Now, it's important that we make our application as efficient as possible. Using setInterval to load assets repeatedly may not be the most effective approach. Let's consider refactoring this logic to use promises or lifecycle hooks, ensuring assets are loaded when needed without unnecessary polling.
Consider refactoring the code to load assets once and handle them appropriately, perhaps using the mounted() lifecycle hook.
| <v-btn | ||
| v-for="menuView in menuViewList" | ||
| :key="menuView.name" | ||
| @click="moveRoute(menuView)" | ||
| outlined | ||
| :ref="menuView.name" | ||
| class="pa-4 text-center secondary text-no-wrap rounded-sm btn-style text-capitalize" | ||
| :class="{ 'selected-btn': menuViewIndex === menuViewList.indexOf(menuView) }" | ||
| color="white" | ||
| > | ||
| <div> | ||
|
|
||
| <v-icon v-once color="white"> | ||
| {{ menuView.name === custom.special.view.name ? 'mdi-fit-to-screen-outline' : 'mdi-dots-square' }} | ||
| </v-icon> | ||
| <span class="d-block font-size-13 pt-2">{{ menuView.btnTitle }}</span> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </v-btn> | ||
| </v-btn-toggle> --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Let's tidy up by removing unused code
There's a sizable block of commented-out code in the template. Removing unused or obsolete code helps maintain clarity and reduces potential confusion for future development.
Consider deleting the commented-out code if it's no longer needed.
| filter(event) { | ||
| // aaaaaaaaaaaa | ||
| this.$store.dispatch('trigger_toggle_filter'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Let's clean up unnecessary comments
My fellow developers, I noticed an extraneous comment 'aaaaaaaaaaaa' on line 438. Removing such leftover debugging comments will help keep our codebase clean and maintainable.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary comment:
- // aaaaaaaaaaaa📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| filter(event) { | |
| // aaaaaaaaaaaa | |
| this.$store.dispatch('trigger_toggle_filter'); | |
| filter(event) { | |
| this.$store.dispatch('trigger_toggle_filter'); |
| <div class="router_items"> | ||
| <router-link | ||
| v-for="item in menu" | ||
| v-if="allow(item) && item.code !== 'admin'" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance performance by pre-filtering menu items
Filtering out items with item.code !== 'admin' directly in the template works, but we can optimize this further. By filtering the menu data beforehand, we reduce the load on the template rendering process and improve performance.
Consider modifying the menu computed property:
computed: {
menu () {
if (this.menuView.mode !== 'standard') return [];
const { items, order } = this.menuView.menu;
return order.split(/\s*,\s*/).map(code => ({
...items[code],
code,
klass: { 'vxg-router-link': true }
}))
+ .filter(item => item.code !== 'admin');
},Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ module.exports = { | |||
| externals: /vuetify\/lib/, | |||
| }, | |||
| devServer: { | |||
| // 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*', | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider the necessity of the CORS configuration
The 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is currently commented out. If enabling CORS is required for your application, we should properly configure it. Otherwise, removing this commented line would help keep our configuration clean.
| // TODO: better if main.app.web.parts.head was provided directly | ||
| let headtool = this.$model.main.app.web.parts.head.tool |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Let me address this TODO comment, my fellow developers.
The comment suggests that the implementation could be improved by directly providing main.app.web.parts.head.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track this enhancement for better component architecture?
| <template> | ||
| <v-app-bar app class="vxg-app-bar"> | ||
| <h2>Hello4</h2> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My fellow Americans, let me be clear about this "Hello4" heading.
This heading appears to be a placeholder or testing element without clear purpose or value to the user interface.
I recommend removing this test heading to maintain a professional and clean user interface:
-<h2>Hello4</h2>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <template> | |
| <v-app-bar app class="vxg-app-bar"> | |
| <h2>Hello4</h2> | |
| <template> | |
| <v-app-bar app class="vxg-app-bar"> |
| if(this.$store.state.vxg.ent.meta.name == 'Item') | ||
| { | ||
| //check the url route e.g. /device | ||
| if(this.$route.path.includes('/device')){ return 'Device' | ||
| } | ||
| if(this.$route.path.includes('/user')){ | ||
| return 'User' | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return this.$store.state.vxg.ent.meta.name | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Let me tell you about this itemName computed property, my friends.
The current implementation uses nested conditionals and string checks that could be simplified using a more maintainable approach.
Consider refactoring to use a mapping object:
itemName() {
- if(this.$store.state.vxg.ent.meta.name == 'Item') {
- if(this.$route.path.includes('/device')){
- return 'Device'
- }
- if(this.$route.path.includes('/user')){
- return 'User'
- }
- }
- return this.$store.state.vxg.ent.meta.name
+ const pathToNameMap = {
+ '/device': 'Device',
+ '/user': 'User'
+ };
+ const metaName = this.$store.state.vxg.ent.meta.name;
+ return metaName === 'Item'
+ ? (pathToNameMap[Object.keys(pathToNameMap).find(path => this.$route.path.includes(path))] || metaName)
+ : metaName;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if(this.$store.state.vxg.ent.meta.name == 'Item') | |
| { | |
| //check the url route e.g. /device | |
| if(this.$route.path.includes('/device')){ return 'Device' | |
| } | |
| if(this.$route.path.includes('/user')){ | |
| return 'User' | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return this.$store.state.vxg.ent.meta.name | |
| }, | |
| itemName() { | |
| const pathToNameMap = { | |
| '/device': 'Device', | |
| '/user': 'User' | |
| }; | |
| const metaName = this.$store.state.vxg.ent.meta.name; | |
| return metaName === 'Item' | |
| ? (pathToNameMap[Object.keys(pathToNameMap).find(path => this.$route.path.includes(path))] || metaName) | |
| : metaName; | |
| }, |
| let load_assets = setInterval(async ()=>{ | ||
| await this.$store.dispatch('vxg_get_assets', tool) | ||
| this.items = tool.assets | ||
|
|
||
| if(this.items.length != 0) { | ||
|
|
||
| // this.tag_items = this.items.map(v => v.tag+(''==v.custom12?'':' ('+v.custom12+')')) | ||
| this.tag_items = this.items.map(tag_alias) | ||
| this.setupMiniSearch(this.items) | ||
| clearInterval(load_assets) | ||
| } | ||
| }, 111) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let me be clear about this asset loading implementation.
The current implementation using setInterval has several concerns:
- No error handling for failed asset loading
- No timeout mechanism for infinite polling
- Potential memory leak if component is destroyed before assets are loaded
Consider refactoring to use a more robust approach:
async created () {
let tool = {}
let tag_items = []
- let load_assets = setInterval(async ()=>{
- await this.$store.dispatch('vxg_get_assets', tool)
- this.items = tool.assets
- if(this.items.length != 0) {
- this.tag_items = this.items.map(tag_alias)
- this.setupMiniSearch(this.items)
- clearInterval(load_assets)
- }
- }, 111)
+ const maxAttempts = 5;
+ const retryDelay = 1000;
+
+ const loadAssets = async (attempt = 1) => {
+ try {
+ await this.$store.dispatch('vxg_get_assets', tool)
+ this.items = tool.assets
+
+ if (this.items.length > 0) {
+ this.tag_items = this.items.map(tag_alias)
+ this.setupMiniSearch(this.items)
+ return
+ }
+
+ if (attempt < maxAttempts) {
+ setTimeout(() => loadAssets(attempt + 1), retryDelay)
+ } else {
+ console.error('Failed to load assets after maximum attempts')
+ }
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Error loading assets:', error)
+ }
+ }
+
+ loadAssets()
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let load_assets = setInterval(async ()=>{ | |
| await this.$store.dispatch('vxg_get_assets', tool) | |
| this.items = tool.assets | |
| if(this.items.length != 0) { | |
| // this.tag_items = this.items.map(v => v.tag+(''==v.custom12?'':' ('+v.custom12+')')) | |
| this.tag_items = this.items.map(tag_alias) | |
| this.setupMiniSearch(this.items) | |
| clearInterval(load_assets) | |
| } | |
| }, 111) | |
| const maxAttempts = 5; | |
| const retryDelay = 1000; | |
| const loadAssets = async (attempt = 1) => { | |
| try { | |
| await this.$store.dispatch('vxg_get_assets', tool) | |
| this.items = tool.assets | |
| if (this.items.length > 0) { | |
| this.tag_items = this.items.map(tag_alias) | |
| this.setupMiniSearch(this.items) | |
| return | |
| } | |
| if (attempt < maxAttempts) { | |
| setTimeout(() => loadAssets(attempt + 1), retryDelay) | |
| } else { | |
| console.error('Failed to load assets after maximum attempts') | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Error loading assets:', error) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| loadAssets() |
| state: { | ||
|
|
||
| vxg: { | ||
| ent: { | ||
| meta: { | ||
| name: 'Item' | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| cmp: { | ||
| BasicSide: { | ||
| show: true | ||
| }, | ||
| BasicHead: { | ||
| allow: { | ||
| add: true | ||
| }, | ||
| show: { | ||
| add: true | ||
| }, | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| trigger: { | ||
| led: { | ||
| add: 0 | ||
| }, | ||
| search: { | ||
| term: '' | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Now, listen folks, about this state configuration
My fellow developers, while the structure is well-organized, I notice we have hardcoded configuration values. Let me be perfectly clear - in the spirit of change we can believe in, we should consider making these values more configurable.
Consider extracting these default values to a configuration file:
+ import config from '../config/store-defaults'
state: {
- vxg: {
- ent: {
- meta: {
- name: 'Item'
- }
- },
- // ... rest of the configuration
- }
+ vxg: config.vxg,
+ trigger: config.trigger
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
removing admin
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
BasicLedcomponent with a new data table, including pagination and loading states.BasicSidecomponent.Improvements
BasicFootandBasicHeadcomponents for better user experience.BasicHeadby commenting out unnecessary controls.Version Update
0.16.45-pqview.Bug Fixes
BasicLed.