Desktop_293 #35
Desktop_293 #35
Conversation
…tion mode gives inconsistent results
….com/plantquest/model-vue into Merge_PQView_DESKTOP_217_232_233_283
WalkthroughMy fellow developers, today we are witnessing a series of strategic updates across our project infrastructure. These changes span multiple files, including Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 Biome (1.9.4)test/basic.test.js[error] 24-24: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation. Unsafe fix: Use a template literal. (lint/style/useTemplate) 🔇 Additional comments (8)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🛑 Comments failed to post (8)
test/basic.test.js (1)
24-24: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
My fellow Americans, let me be clear about improving our code readability.
Let me tell you why we need to make this change. You see, template literals aren't just about syntax - they're about making our code more accessible and maintainable for all Americans who contribute to this great project.
Here's what we propose:
- expect(exists ? cm : 'not-found:' + specfile).equal(cm) + expect(exists ? cm : `not-found:${specfile}`).equal(cm)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.expect(exists ? cm : `not-found:${specfile}`).equal(cm)🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 24-24: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
src/components/BasicSide.vue (4)
360-364: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Let me be clear about our code hygiene.
We have several blocks of commented-out code that should be removed if they're no longer needed. This includes the path data retrieval code and the old toggleSearch2 method.
Remove these commented-out code blocks to improve code maintainability.
Also applies to: 520-522
721-725: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Now, let me address this styling situation.
The z-index value of 99999 is unnecessarily high and could cause issues with other overlapping elements in the future.
I recommend adjusting this to a more reasonable value:
.v-divider { position: absolute; - z-index: 99999; + z-index: 10; left: -11px; width: 100%; bottom: 52px; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.position: absolute; z-index: 10; left: -11px; width: 100%; bottom: 52px;
148-150:
⚠️ Potential issueMy fellow Americans, let me be clear about this close button implementation.
The button appears to be missing its icon content, which could leave our users confused about its purpose.
Let me propose this change to ensure proper functionality:
- <button @click="showSearch2 = false" style=""> - <v-icon style="font-size: 12px !important;bottom: 78px;right: calc(100% - 250px);background-color: #dbe9f5;border-radius: 6px;color: #283348;" ></v-icon> - </button> + <button @click="showSearch2 = false" class="close-nav-btn"> + <v-icon style="font-size: 12px !important;bottom: 78px;right: calc(100% - 250px);background-color: #dbe9f5;border-radius: 6px;color: #283348;">mdi-close</v-icon> + </button>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<button @click="showSearch2 = false" class="close-nav-btn"> <v-icon style="font-size: 12px !important;bottom: 78px;right: calc(100% - 250px);background-color: #dbe9f5;border-radius: 6px;color: #283348;">mdi-close</v-icon> </button>
529-533: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Let me be straight with you about this navigation mode handler.
The handleNavigationMode function sets showSearch2 but doesn't handle cleanup of previous selections or state. This could lead to the very issue mentioned in the PR objectives where polygon selection state persists incorrectly.
I propose we enhance this implementation:
handleNavigationMode(){ console.log('Trigger select:', this.triggerSelect); + // Clear any existing selections before entering navigation mode + this.$store.dispatch('vxg_trigger_clear'); this.showSearch2 = true - //this.$store.dispatch('vxg_trigger_clear'); + this.toggleExpansion(); },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.handleNavigationMode(){ console.log('Trigger select:', this.triggerSelect); // Clear any existing selections before entering navigation mode this.$store.dispatch('vxg_trigger_clear'); this.showSearch2 = true this.toggleExpansion(); },src/components/BasicNavStages.vue (2)
2-2:
⚠️ Potential issueLet's correct 'routeMassages' to 'routeMessages' for clarity.
Folks, I've noticed that throughout the code, the variable
routeMassagesis used. It seems there might be a small typo, and you intended to userouteMessages. Correcting this will enhance readability and prevent any potential confusion.Here's the suggested change:
- routeMassages + routeMessagesAlso applies to: 23-27, 55-55
148-156: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Uncomment or remove the unused mutation in
selectStagemethod.Now, in the
selectStagemethod, there's a line that's been commented out://this.$store.commit('setMapIndex', index);If
setMapIndexis no longer needed, consider removing it entirely. If it's essential for updating the store, let's uncomment it to ensure the state is correctly managed.Apply this diff accordingly:
- //this.$store.commit('setMapIndex', index); + this.$store.commit('setMapIndex', index);package.json (1)
33-70: 💡 Codebase verification
My fellow developers, let me be clear about our dependency situation
Look, we've got some security vulnerabilities that we need to address. Our ESLint version 6 is vulnerable to a moderate severity Regular Expression Denial of Service attack. And yes, while our Vue 2.6.12 has a low-severity vulnerability, there's a patch version 2.7.16 available that we should consider.
Let me lay out a clear path forward:
- Upgrade ESLint beyond 4.18.2 to address the security vulnerability
- Consider upgrading Vue to 2.7.16 for the latest security patches
- Hold off on the Vuetify 3.x upgrade until we're ready for Vue 3
Now, I want to emphasize that these are all development dependencies, but as I've always said, the security of our development pipeline is just as important as the security of our production code.
🔗 Analysis chain
Now, let me be straight with you about these dependencies.
My fellow developers, I've noticed several dependencies that require our attention. Vue 2.6.12, Vuetify 2.5.1, and ESLint 6 are getting a bit long in the tooth. Let me be clear - this is a matter of cybersecurity and maintaining the American dream of bug-free code.
Let's check for any known vulnerabilities:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for outdated packages and potential vulnerabilities echo "Checking Vue.js version compatibility..." curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/vuejs/vue/releases/latest | jq .tag_name echo "Checking Vuetify latest version..." curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/vuetifyjs/vuetify/releases/latest | jq .tag_name # Check for security advisories gh api graphql -f query=' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "vue") { nodes { advisory { summary severity } vulnerableVersionRange } } }'Length of output: 840
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check ESLint vulnerabilities gh api graphql -f query=' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "eslint") { nodes { advisory { summary severity } vulnerableVersionRange } } }' # Check for version constraints in package-lock.json echo "Checking package-lock.json for dependency constraints..." if [ -f package-lock.json ]; then jq '.dependencies,.devDependencies | .. | select(.version?) | select(.version | contains("[email protected]") or contains("[email protected]") or contains("eslint@6"))' package-lock.json fiLength of output: 538
Selecting a polygon while viewing a route, then going back to navigation mode gives inconsistent results
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
0.16.110-pqview-mergedistdirectory to.gitignoreDocumentation