Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not force miss slider with strict tracking active if tracking is lost before head was judged #31304

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bdach
Copy link
Collaborator

@bdach bdach commented Dec 27, 2024

Closes #29371.

#26053 is a previous related fix that should probably have included this change but did not go far enough.

An interesting part of this is the part that pertains to what should happen when the slider head is not hit (see test cases added in 033fe3f). I've opted to go with the lenient choice, which is to let the user continue to pick up tracking the slider even after the head was missed (but if tracking is lost at any point after that, the tail will miss as usual).

…ost before head was hit

Closes ppy#29371.

ppy#26053 is a related fix that should
probably have included this change but did not go far enough.
@ashandelle
Copy link

Do any of the test cases include behavior around slider ticks?

@bdach
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bdach commented Dec 28, 2024

Why would ticks be relevant here in any capacity?

@ashandelle
Copy link

Nevermind, I thought that ticks were stricter but after testing their not. I was wondering if a test case should be made for missing both the head and a tick, but it seems that would just count as missing the body/tail.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Strict Tracking mod seems inconsistent
2 participants