-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 193
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OMS: add video support #3779
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
OMS: add video support #3779
Conversation
|
||
String pid; | ||
|
||
Integer publisherId; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
add JsonProperty
also I would change the integration test payload to cover publisherId
parameter
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have cheanged pid to publisherId but IMO its indifferent
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the pid
is declared as deprecated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant, it makes sense to add a publisherId to the test instead of deprecated pid, but pid is still can be used, it's deprecated, not removed, please revert this change
public Result<List<HttpRequest<BidRequest>>> makeHttpRequests(BidRequest request) { | ||
String uri = endpointUrl; | ||
|
||
if (!request.getImp().isEmpty()) { | ||
try { | ||
final ExtImpOms impExt = parseImpExt(request.getImp().get(0)); | ||
if (impExt != null) { | ||
if (impExt.getPid() != null && !impExt.getPid().isEmpty()) { | ||
uri = String.format("%s?publisherId=%s", endpointUrl, impExt.getPid()); | ||
} else if (impExt.getPublisherId() != null && impExt.getPublisherId() > 0) { | ||
uri = String.format("%s?publisherId=%d", endpointUrl, impExt.getPublisherId()); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} catch (PreBidException e) { | ||
return Result.withError(BidderError.badInput(e.getMessage())); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
return Result.withValue(BidderUtil.defaultRequest(request, uri, mapper)); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe it can work this way
try {
final ExtImpOms impExt = parseImpExt(request.getImp().getFirst());
final String publisherId = impExt.getPid() == null && impExt.getPublisherId() != null && impExt.getPublisherId() > 0
? String.valueOf(impExt.getPublisherId())
: impExt.getPid();
final String url = "%s?publisherId=%s".formatted(endpointUrl, publisherId);
return Result.withValue(BidderUtil.defaultRequest(request, url, mapper));
} catch (PreBidException e) {
return Result.withError(BidderError.badInput(e.getMessage()));
}
@@ -59,7 +91,15 @@ private static List<BidderBid> bidsFromResponse(BidResponse bidResponse) { | |||
.map(SeatBid::getBid) | |||
.filter(Objects::nonNull) | |||
.flatMap(Collection::stream) | |||
.map(bid -> BidderBid.of(bid, BidType.banner, bidResponse.getCur())) | |||
.map(bid -> BidderBid.of(bid, getBidType(bid.getMtype()), bidResponse.getCur())) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the following is not ported
func getBidVideo(bidType openrtb_ext.BidType, bid *openrtb2.Bid) *openrtb_ext.ExtBidPrebidVideo {
if bidType != openrtb_ext.BidTypeVideo {
return nil
}
var primaryCategory string
if len(bid.Cat) > 0 {
primaryCategory = bid.Cat[0]
}
return &openrtb_ext.ExtBidPrebidVideo{
Duration: int(bid.Dur),
PrimaryCategory: primaryCategory,
}
}
return catNotEmpty || durationValid | ||
? ExtBidPrebidVideo.of( | ||
durationValid ? duration : null, | ||
catNotEmpty ? cat.getFirst() : null) | ||
: null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In Go they always create a video object
also a duration validation seems redundant (again, according to Go)
final Integer markupType = bid.getMtype(); | ||
return switch (markupType) { | ||
case 1 -> BidType.banner; | ||
case 2 -> BidType.video; | ||
case null, default -> throw new PreBidException("Unsupported mType " + mType); | ||
case null, default -> BidType.banner; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
return Objects.equals(bid.getMtype(), 2) ? BidType.video : BidType.banner;
}; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static ExtBidPrebidVideo videoInfo(Bid bid) { | ||
if (!Integer.valueOf(2).equals(bid.getMtype())) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd use a bid type resolved on the previous step
|
||
String pid; | ||
|
||
Integer publisherId; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the pid
is declared as deprecated
public class ExtImpOms { | ||
|
||
String pid; | ||
@JsonProperty("publisherId") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
add an empty line
final String publisherId = impExt.getPublisherId() != null && impExt.getPublisherId() > 0 | ||
? String.valueOf(impExt.getPublisherId()) : null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why did you change it? I believe in the last commit it was correct
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
because U said that pid is deprecated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
deprecated doesn't mean removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so i should add only annotation @deprecated on pid filed ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the initial point was about using publisherId
in the integration test instead of pid
, that's it, everything else was fine, the pid
is still supported
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the integration test I used only publisherId.
I used pid only in unit test.
Should it look like this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes
: null; | ||
return ExtBidPrebidVideo.of( | ||
duration != null ? duration : 0, | ||
CollectionUtils.isNotEmpty(cat) ? cat.getFirst() : "" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
StringUtils.EMPTY
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ | |||
@Value(staticConstructor = "of") | |||
public class ExtImpOms { | |||
|
|||
String pid; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do not need to remove, since it's present in Go
|
||
String pid; | ||
|
||
Integer publisherId; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant, it makes sense to add a publisherId to the test instead of deprecated pid, but pid is still can be used, it's deprecated, not removed, please revert this change
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public final Result<List<BidderBid>> makeBids(BidderCall<BidRequest> httpCall, BidRequest bidRequest) { | ||
try { | ||
final BidResponse bidResponse = mapper.decodeValue(httpCall.getResponse().getBody(), BidResponse.class); | ||
return Result.withValues(extractBids(bidResponse)); | ||
} catch (DecodeException e) { | ||
} catch (DecodeException | PreBidException e) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is PrebidException expected anywhere?
final Integer duration = bid.getDur(); | ||
|
||
return ExtBidPrebidVideo.of( | ||
duration != null ? duration : 0, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ObjectUtils.defaultIfNull
🔧 Type of changes
✨ What's the context?
#3770