Skip to content

chore: release v0.106.0#2111

Merged
mabry1985 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
prepare-release/v0.106.0
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

chore: release v0.106.0#2111
mabry1985 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
prepare-release/v0.106.0

Conversation

@mabry1985

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Automated version bump to v0.106.0. Review + merge through the normal CI/review gate, then push the tag to cut the release: git checkout main && git pull && git tag -a v0.106.0 -m 'Release v0.106.0' && git push origin v0.106.0. The tag push triggers release.yml (Docker tags + GitHub Release + Discord) — don't also workflow_dispatch release.yml afterward (redundant; 422s on the duplicate).

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@mabry1985, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 45 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3919001c-ece8-4a93-a45a-ae813e7ba253

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b80d7b and 1963703.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md is excluded by !*.md
  • uv.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pyproject.toml
  • sites/marketing/data/changelog.json
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch prepare-release/v0.106.0

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@protoreview protoreview Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QA panel review — PASS

code-review-structural · head 19637031a75f · formal

[review-synthesizer completed: workflow code-review-structural:report]

The overall risk of this change is low, as the structural analysis pass flagged several dependency issues that were subsequently refuted by the verifier. No correctness or security defects were identified. The primary point of disagreement was the current state of PyPI versioning for LangChain, which the verifier resolved in favor of the PR's constraints. Verification resulted in the removal of all reported findings.

Gaps: The structural pass was performed but all its findings were refuted.

[]

@mabry1985
mabry1985 merged commit dffaba5 into main Jul 21, 2026
10 of 11 checks passed
@mabry1985
mabry1985 deleted the prepare-release/v0.106.0 branch July 21, 2026 10:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant