chore(release): v0.107.0#2130
Conversation
…rtifacts, fleet inputs/secrets Bump 0.106.0 → 0.107.0 and roll the changelog for the release. Highlights: - Versioned file artifacts + save_file_artifact (ADR 0092 D2, #2126) - Document-generation stack baked into the desktop bundle (ADR 0092 D1, #2123) - Fleet agents accept operator inputs + secrets at create time (#2121/#2122/#2125/#2127) - Deterministic persona-drift detection (#2116) - Chat tab context menu Close Others/Left/Right (#2112) - Fixes: archetype-catalog bundling (#2115), PyPI publishes on tag push (#2113) Backfilled [Unreleased] entries for the feature PRs that lacked them, rolled to [0.107.0], scaffolded + polished the marketing changelog. uv.lock: project version line only (surgical — avoids uv 0.11.13-vs-pinned-0.11.29 marker drift). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EVmWoy2TdXdMshNn5WBR2Z
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 45 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
QA panel review — PASS
code-review-structural · head 4f050b3e8c21 · formal
[review-synthesizer completed: workflow code-review-structural:report]
Prose Brief
Overall risk: None — this is a pure release chore bumping the version from 0.106.1 to 0.107.0 across four metadata files (CITATION.cff, CHANGELOG.md, Cargo.toml, pyproject.toml). No production code, logic, or configuration semantics change.
Fix-first item: Nothing to fix. The diff is correct on its face: every version string is updated consistently.
Panel disagreement: None. The panel (LLM finders + protoPatch structural pass) produced no findings that survived dedup, and the verifier confirmed that the protoPatch flags were all on pre-existing lines untouched by the diff.
What verification changed: Nothing to change — the input findings array was already empty, and the verifier confirmed this matches the diff.
Gaps: The structural pass (protoPatch) flagged stale pyproject.toml dependency pins, but those lines are outside the diff hunk and correctly excluded. A possible missing link-reference footer for [0.107.0] in CHANGELOG.md was noted in the brief; it's an editorial concern (not a code defect) and was never filed as a formal finding. No coverage gaps — every changed file was read.
[]
Version bump 0.106.0 → 0.107.0 + rolled changelog for the release (10 PRs merged since v0.106.0).
What ships in v0.107.0
Added
save_file_artifact+ afileartifact kind (sidecar blobs, diffable text preview, image thumbnails, download card). ADR 0092 D2 (feat(artifact): versioned file/download artifacts — save_file_artifact (ADR 0092 D2) #2126)peek_bundle/lock expose bundle inputs+secrets, backend seeds them, new-agent input picker + preview, Settings ▸ Secrets behindsecrets-panelflag (feat: console: gate Settings ▸ Secrets behindsecrets-paneldev flag #2121/feat: Enrich peek_bundle + lock to expose bundle mcp inputs and secrets #2122/feat: Backend — accept operator inputs + secrets at fleet create time #2125/feat: Frontend — input picker in NewAgentPanel + preview dialog enrichment #2127)Fixed
Release mechanics
Prepared locally (equivalent to
prepare-release.yml): version bump,CHANGELOG.md [Unreleased]backfilled for the feature PRs that lacked entries then rolled to[0.107.0], marketingchangelog.jsonscaffolded + polished (no overclaims — every bullet is a shipped change),uv.lockproject-version line only (surgical, to avoid uv0.11.13-vs-pinned-0.11.29marker drift).After merge: tag
v0.107.0→release.yml(Docker + GitHub Release + Discord) +publish.yml(PyPI); then dispatchdesktop-build.yml -f tag=v0.107.0for the desktop app.🤖 Generated with Claude Code