-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
x509 Verification: Extension policies documentation. #11800
Open
deivse
wants to merge
6
commits into
pyca:main
Choose a base branch
from
deivse:x509_verification_extension_policy_builder_docs
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+198
−24
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9e28bf5
Add docs related to custom x509 verification extension policies.
deivse c935e6d
Improve naming of extension policy builder methods.
deivse 76407fe
Use single method to set both extension policies.
deivse 775c83d
Slight adjustment to ExtensionPolicy documentation to use x509 spec t…
deivse 0385f54
Replace some fields on [Client|Server]Verifier with `policy` property…
deivse bf4412d
Doc updates per PR discussion.
deivse File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ committers | |
conda | ||
CPython | ||
Cryptanalysis | ||
criticalities | ||
crypto | ||
cryptographic | ||
cryptographically | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We may want to keep these around as proxies, but this isn't terrible important.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would add that at a later time if it's deemed required. The API is declared as being unstable in the docs, but I understand that we shouldn't go out of our way to introduce breaking changes 😄 Let's keep this conversation unresolved so once we get back to this PR we can look into this again.