Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport maintenance/3.2.x] [release] Fix 3.2.4's release date following twine 5.1.0's issues #9750

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport d8f84b0 from #9749.

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added the Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining pylint or the dev workflow label Jun 26, 2024
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added this to the 3.2.5 milestone Jun 26, 2024
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas enabled auto-merge (squash) June 26, 2024 07:41
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.82%. Comparing base (425ad66) to head (64b1f8c).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           maintenance/3.2.x    #9750   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              95.82%   95.82%           
==================================================
  Files                    174      174           
  Lines                  18843    18843           
==================================================
  Hits                   18057    18057           
  Misses                   786      786           

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas merged commit 6c3ab77 into maintenance/3.2.x Jun 26, 2024
25 checks passed
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas deleted the backport-9749-to-maintenance/3.2.x branch June 26, 2024 07:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining pylint or the dev workflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant