Implement nlinalg Ops in PyTorch

[twaclaw]

Description

Implemented Ops:

• SVD
• Det
• SLogDet
• Eig
• Eigh
• KroneckerProduct
• MatrixInverse
• MatrixPinv
• QRFul

Related Issue

• Closes #
• Related to Implement all Ops in PyTorch (help welcome!) #821

Checklist

• Checked that the pre-commit linting/style checks pass
• Included tests that prove the fix is effective or that the new feature works
• Added necessary documentation (docstrings and/or example notebooks)
• If you are a pro: each commit corresponds to a relevant logical change

Type of change

• New feature / enhancement
• Bug fix
• Documentation
• Maintenance
• Other (please specify):

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.80645% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.60%. Comparing base (d455460) to head (2d061a5).
Report is 83 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pytensor/link/pytorch/dispatch/nlinalg.py	75.40%	15 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #920      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.60%   81.60%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         178      179       +1     
  Lines       47209    47271      +62     
  Branches    11478    11481       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        38527    38574      +47     
- Misses       6496     6511      +15     
  Partials     2186     2186              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
pytensor/link/pytorch/dispatch/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pytensor/link/pytorch/dispatch/nlinalg.py	75.40% <75.40%> (ø)

[ricardoV94]

Looks great, but I think a few of those Ops are already being addressed in other PRs.

[twaclaw]

Looks great, but I think a few of those Ops are already being addressed in other PRs.

I see. I mixed the linalg and math ops because they were in the same file. Sorry about that. What should I do ? Should I keep only the linalg ops in this PR?

[twaclaw]

@ricardoV94, what about Max? It is not listed in the description of #821.

[ricardoV94]

@ricardoV94, what about Max? It is not listed in the description of #821.

Should have been handled as part of the CAReduce, unless we missed it

[ricardoV94]

There are some conflicts, and a small comment on the test. Otherwise looks good to me