Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Retain input ordering in loadscope #1098

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Toad2186
Copy link

@Toad2186 Toad2186 commented Jun 12, 2024

  • Optionally retain input ordering in loadscope for tests where relative ordering matters. i.e. guarantee that, given [input_1, input_2], input_2 never runs before input_1. On any given worker, either input_1 has ran before input_2, or input_1 has never and will never run on this worker.

Thanks for submitting a PR, your contribution is really appreciated!

Here's a quick checklist that should be present in PRs:

  • Make sure to include reasonable tests for your change if necessary

  • We use towncrier for changelog management, so please add a news file into the changelog folder following these guidelines:

    • Name it $issue_id.$type for example 588.bugfix;

    • If you don't have an issue_id change it to the PR id after creating it

    • Ensure type is one of removal, feature, bugfix, vendor, doc or trivial

    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example:

      Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files.
      

@Toad2186 Toad2186 force-pushed the toan/loadscope-retain-ordering branch 2 times, most recently from 86476d4 to 4d1892a Compare June 12, 2024 23:51
* Optionally retain input ordering in loadscope for tests where relative
  ordering matters. i.e. guarantee that, given [input_1, input_2],
  input_2 never runs before input_1. On any given worker, either input_
  has ran before input_2, or input_1 has never and will never run on
  this worker.
@Toad2186 Toad2186 force-pushed the toan/loadscope-retain-ordering branch from 4d1892a to ef17eac Compare June 12, 2024 23:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant