-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
Remove support for Python 3.9 #13724
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Love the new strict=True ! I reviewed the diff, might take a look at what might be missing later. Adding match cases should be done in another MR, right ?
Some fixes for CI failures:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @bluetech!
- Can run :ref:`unittest <unittest>` (including trial) test suites out of the box | ||
|
||
- Python 3.8+ or PyPy 3 | ||
- Python 3.10+ or PyPy 3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ditto.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one was not removed ?
It will be end-of-life (or on its last breaths) by the time of the next release. Refs pytest-dev#13719
Yes, if there are places that can be improved with match/case we can do it separately. |
Opened #13727 for match cases as a follow-up |
I'll merge this so we can start depending on Python 3.10. |
It will be end-of-life (or on its last breaths) by the time of the next release.
I tried to cover everything, but might have missed something.
The biggest annoyance is the lint which forces explicit
strict
onzip
calls. I was tempted to add the lint to ignores, but it's actually a good lint so I audited allzip
calls, hopefully I got it right. It did bring up #13723.Refs #13719