Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[stubsabot] Bump protobuf to 5.28.* #12604

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Release: https://pypi.org/pypi/protobuf/5.28.2
Homepage: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
Repository: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf
Typeshed stubs: https://github.com/python/typeshed/tree/main/stubs/protobuf

If stubtest fails for this PR:

  • Leave this PR open (as a reminder, and to prevent stubsabot from opening another PR)
  • Fix stubtest failures in another PR, then close this PR

Note that you will need to close and re-open the PR in order to trigger CI

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bot: stubsabot 🤖 PRs created by stubsabot 🤖 label Aug 29, 2024
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood reopened this Aug 29, 2024
@Avasam
Copy link
Collaborator

Avasam commented Sep 7, 2024

#12527 should make it easier and faster to update proto stubs by anyone. I still had a design question though

Release: https://pypi.org/pypi/protobuf/5.28.2
Homepage: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
Repository: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf
Typeshed stubs: https://github.com/python/typeshed/tree/main/stubs/protobuf

If stubtest fails for this PR:
- Leave this PR open (as a reminder, and to prevent stubsabot from opening another PR)
- Fix stubtest failures in another PR, then close this PR

Note that you will need to close and re-open the PR in order to trigger CI
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bot: stubsabot 🤖 PRs created by stubsabot 🤖
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants