Upgrade all dependencies where doing so wouldn't cause breaking changes.

[grahambinns]

I created this branch because I'm currently working on a project which will use this library, but which has conflicting dependencies.

[grahambinns]

Missed running clippy — sloppy of me. Will fix that lint and then re-push.

[grahambinns]

Turns out that running clippy --all-targets opened quite the worm-can 🙃 . I've addressed all of the lints it threw up for the sake of making sure no-one else trips over them in future.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.77%. Comparing base (6a98283) to head (3ef4728).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #303      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.12%   88.77%   -0.35%     
==========================================
  Files          81       81              
  Lines        7625     7112     -513     
==========================================
- Hits         6796     6314     -482     
+ Misses        829      798      -31     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Gsantomaggio]

@wolf4ood @allevo wdyt?

[grahambinns]

Thanks for the ✅ @Gsantomaggio.

It looks like codecov has bumped on the fact that some lines have been removed — which is detailed in the codecov docs. There are a few options there for how we could deal with this, but AIUI the default setup for codecov is for it to adjust the calculation to filter out code removals.

How would you like me to proceed with addressing the codecov/project failure?

[Gsantomaggio]

How would you like me to proceed with addressing the codecov/project failure?

yes please but I would do that in another PR.

Thank you for your time @grahambinns

[allevo]

LGTM

[Gsantomaggio]

@grahambinns Our company did some changes around open source contribution, and now it's required that you sign a contributor license agreement (CLA) before we can accept your PR.

The process is explained here in this repo README: https://github.com/rabbitmq/cla

Would you review and sign this CLA?

Then we can merge! Thanks @grahambinns

[grahambinns]

@Gsantomaggio Sure, that's no problem. I'll take care of that today and let you know when it's done.