Automated Resyntax fixes #723

resyntax-ci · 2025-02-23T00:11:03Z

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 5 files.

Fixed 12 occurrences of let-to-define
Fixed 1 occurrence of zero-comparison-to-positive?
Fixed 1 occurrence of send-chain-to-send+
Fixed 1 occurrence of if-begin-to-cond
Fixed 1 occurrence of nested-if-to-cond
Fixed 1 occurrence of map-to-for
Fixed 1 occurrence of define-lambda-to-define
Fixed 1 occurrence of cond-let-to-cond-define
Fixed 1 occurrence of hash-ref-with-constant-lambda-to-hash-ref-without-lambda

…t-lambda` The lambda can be removed from the failure result in this `hash-ref` expression.

Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.

The `define` form supports a shorthand for defining functions.

This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.

This method chain made of nested `send` expressions can be written more clearly as a `send+` expression.

This `if`-`else` chain can be converted to a `cond` expression.

Using `cond` instead of `if` here makes `begin` unnecessary

This expression is equivalent to calling the `positive?` predicate.

resyntax-ci bot added 9 commits February 23, 2025 00:11

Fix 1 occurrence of `hash-ref-with-constant-lambda-to-hash-ref-withou…

e1489c8

…t-lambda` The lambda can be removed from the failure result in this `hash-ref` expression.

Fix 12 occurrences of let-to-define

c33df7c

Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.

Fix 1 occurrence of cond-let-to-cond-define

90b8810

Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.

Fix 1 occurrence of define-lambda-to-define

d2977d4

The `define` form supports a shorthand for defining functions.

Fix 1 occurrence of map-to-for

d64b0f4

This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.

Fix 1 occurrence of send-chain-to-send+

128f1bb

This method chain made of nested `send` expressions can be written more clearly as a `send+` expression.

Fix 1 occurrence of nested-if-to-cond

b224f67

This `if`-`else` chain can be converted to a `cond` expression.

Fix 1 occurrence of if-begin-to-cond

22a5b6b

Using `cond` instead of `if` here makes `begin` unnecessary

Fix 1 occurrence of zero-comparison-to-positive?

31ea0f3

This expression is equivalent to calling the `positive?` predicate.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Automated Resyntax fixes #723

Automated Resyntax fixes #723

resyntax-ci bot commented Feb 23, 2025

Automated Resyntax fixes #723

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Automated Resyntax fixes #723

Conversation

resyntax-ci bot commented Feb 23, 2025