Forward-merge branch-24.08 into branch-24.10 #1408
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![rapids-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/85914?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This PR updates the latest CUDA build/test version 12.2.2 to 12.5.1. Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#73 Authors: - Kyle Edwards (https://github.com/KyleFromNVIDIA) - https://github.com/jakirkham Approvers: - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb) - https://github.com/jakirkham URL: #1405
|
FAILURE - Unable to forward-merge due to an error, manual merge is necessary. Do not use the IMPORTANT: When merging this PR, do not use the auto-merger (i.e. the |
Authors: - Kyle Edwards (https://github.com/KyleFromNVIDIA) Approvers: - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb) URL: #1399
Previously `cmake` was added to `requirements/host`. However it is a build tool. So should be placed in `requirements/build`. This makes that change in relevant recipes. Authors: - https://github.com/jakirkham Approvers: - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb) URL: #1409
3 tasks
|
Resolving conflicts in PR: #1410 |
rapidsai/cudf#16285 makes `_from_data` explicitly requires the `data.values()` to all be a `ColumnBase`. This PR either ensures they are columns or just goes through the normal `GeoDataFrame`/`DataFrame` constructor if they are not. Authors: - Matthew Roeschke (https://github.com/mroeschke) Approvers: - Mark Harris (https://github.com/harrism) - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice) URL: #1415
Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#31 In short, RAPIDS DLFW builds want to produce wheels with unsuffixed dependencies, e.g. `cudf` depending on `rmm`, not `rmm-cu12`. This PR is part of a series across all of RAPIDS to try to support that type of build by setting up CUDA-suffixed and CUDA-unsuffixed dependency lists in `dependencies.yaml`. For more details, see: * rapidsai/build-planning#31 (comment) * rapidsai/cudf#16183 ## Notes for Reviewers ### Why target 24.08? This is targeting 24.08 because: 1. it should be very low-risk 2. getting these changes into 24.08 prevents the need to carry around patches for every library in DLFW builds using RAPIDS 24.08 Authors: - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb) - Vyas Ramasubramani (https://github.com/vyasr) Approvers: - Vyas Ramasubramani (https://github.com/vyasr) URL: #1414
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Forward-merge triggered by push to branch-24.08 that creates a PR to keep branch-24.10 up-to-date. If this PR is unable to be immediately merged due to conflicts, it will remain open for the team to manually merge. See forward-merger docs for more info.