Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Skip explicit-comms tests when dask-expr is active #1322

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024
Merged

Skip explicit-comms tests when dask-expr is active #1322

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

rjzamora
Copy link
Member

We should skip explicit-comms tests when dask-expr is active (for now).

Adding dask-expr support is part of #1311

@rjzamora rjzamora added bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Mar 18, 2024
@rjzamora rjzamora requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2024 19:01
@github-actions github-actions bot added the python python code needed label Mar 18, 2024
@pentschev pentschev mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2024
Open
2 tasks
pentschev
pentschev approved these changes Mar 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@pentschev pentschev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable. Thanks @rjzamora .

@rjzamora
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@rjzamora rjzamora mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2024
Merged
@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit dcdc481 into rapidsai:branch-24.06 Mar 18, 2024
27 checks passed
@rjzamora rjzamora deleted the skip-explicit-comms-tests branch March 18, 2024 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pentschev pentschev pentschev approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change python python code needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@rjzamora @pentschev