Sync with react.dev @ c2d61310 #90
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Google uses this on many of our API doc pages and it's not a good snippet. Only put this on the homepage but leave the og:description and twitter:description.
* Adds landing page for reference section.) * Updated hyperlinks. * Fixes Legacy APIs link. * Removes canary image from heading.
Co-authored-by: Sophie Alpert <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Luna Wei <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Soichiro Miki <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David McCabe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Luna Wei <[email protected]>
* Edits for new "use client" content * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Luna <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Luna <[email protected]>
Summary of changes: "Server Action", like "Effect", is a React-specific notion that would be benefited from captailization to be distinguished from its genertic meaning. It seems like [Next doc](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/functions/server-actions) has also adopted such connventions and we should probably do the same. Co-authored-by: xuan.huang <[email protected]>
Summary of changes: following <reactjs/react.dev#6417> Co-authored-by: xuan.huang <[email protected]>
Summary of changes: See <reactjs/react.dev#6417> Co-authored-by: xuan.huang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Luna Wei <[email protected]>
Summary of changes: See <reactjs/react.dev#6417>. There is one exception though. The error message “Rendered fewer hooks than expected” from React is indeed "hooks" so I kept as-is. Shall we change the error message from React? Co-authored-by: xuan.huang <[email protected]>
Summary of changes: See <reactjs/react.dev#6417> Co-authored-by: xuan.huang <[email protected]>
Summary of changes: See <reactjs/react.dev#6417> Co-authored-by: xuan.huang <[email protected]>
…(#6445) * Fix: component not returned * Fix: missing function statement
Summary of changes: There is one "TypeScript strict mode" that is kept unchanged. Co-authored-by: xuan.huang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Silbermann <[email protected]>
this way "cannot be marked" is all the same style and you don't skim the link text and gloss over the "cannot be"
Fix very minor typo
Added missing comma to the codesample.
Expo now has its own instructions for enabling the compiler.
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Silbermann <[email protected]>
…(#7108) * Emphasize the second problem acapit with chain of effects example * Replace 'One' with 'First' to keep problems counting consistent
PR to add Radv 2024 conference
Co-authored-by: Tom Eastman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was automatically generated.
Merge changes from react.dev at c2d6131
The following files have conflicts and may need new translations:
Please fix the conflicts by pushing new commits to this pull request, either by editing the files directly on GitHub or by checking out this branch.
DO NOT SQUASH MERGE THIS PULL REQUEST!
Doing so will "erase" the commits from main and cause them to show up as conflicts the next time we merge.