-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
docs: fix typo in "threshholded" to "thresholded" #31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe documentation file was updated to correct a spelling error. The term "threshholded" has been replaced with "thresholded" in the description of thresholded OPRF. No other modifications or changes to public declarations were made. Changes
Poem
Tip ⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 LanguageTooldocs/claim-creation.md[style] ~202-~202: Consider replacing this phrase with the adverb “consistently” to avoid wordiness. (IN_A_X_MANNER) 🔇 Additional comments (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Description
a typo in the documentation where the word "threshholded" was used instead of the correct "thresholded." This appeared in the TOPRF section:
Both instances have been updated to "thresholded" for accuracy.
Type of change
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit