[ENG-4010]Codeblock cleanup in markdown

[ElijahAhianyo]

Decouple the code block component (React Syntax Highlighter) from the markdown component. Also move the Markdown component map function var creation logic to the component level.
With this change, the react syntax highlighter logic/imports don't get compiled when a different code block is used.

[ElijahAhianyo]

The behavior here is to get the map_fn_var of the component. However just like the existing behaviour was (before this PR), it is--and was--assumed that the targetted component is not wrapped in a parent component or the component is not memorized (using rx.memo). This assumption is a bit problematic.
Eg.

component_map = {
"p": lambda value: Text.create(value, margin_y="1em"),
}

If the component in the lambda fn (Text) mixes MarkdownComponentMap, it is straightforward to obtain the map_fn_var. However, if the component returns the component in a wrapper (eg. Text.create returning Text wrapped in a Box), then its not obvious how to extract the var. Another eg is the case of returning a memorized fn that returns a component instead of a direct component:

@rx.memo
def code_block(code: str, language: str):
    return rx.box(
        rx.code_block(
            code,
            language=language,
            class_name="code-block",
            can_copy=True,
        ),
        class_name="relative mb-4",
    )

def code_block_markdown(*children, **props):
    language = props.get("language", "plain")
    return code_block(code=children[0], language=language)

...
rx.markdown("# header", component_map={"codeblock": code_block_markdown}),

(codeblock is treated differently because of the inline logic we have so this should be fine but think of an alternative eg)

A fix for this was to recursively traverse the component tree and find the child with the appropriate var, but this introduces another problem where if a parent component is of the MarkdownComponentMap type, we might be getting the wrong var. In this case, what do we do? I think this is one to think about or consider. I initially had this implementation as a recursive one but I had to revert this to follow the exact behavior as was previously

[linear]

ENG-4010 Markdown component always imports react syntax highlighter

[masenf]

i like the approach of making it customizable per component and taking the special case out of the template rendering logic.

as for limiting the recursive searching, i think that's also okay. as it stands now, there's just no way to customize the render function var for custom components; if a user needs a custom composite component, they could just mix Box and MarkdownComponentMap and do what they need to do.

[adhami3310]

Look good in general! I feel there's something in general of

when language is given to code that is not a literal string var then add the dynamic import, otherwise use static imports

in which case, markdown should be a lot simpler

[adhami3310]

It seems using markdown with this always imports python syntax highlighting even when no python block is there, why is that?

[adhami3310]

This fails:

component_map={
    "codeblock": lambda value, **props: rx.text(
        "Props: ", props, ". Value: ", value
    ),
},

[adhami3310]

This:

rx.code_block(
    """use reflex::events::Events;""",
    language="rust",
)

Returns something like:

export function Prismasynclight_8ebdbf53b7f95eef99249393f8836500() {
  const { resolvedColorMode } = useContext(ColorModeContext);

  const _language = "rust";

  if (_language) {
    (async () => {
      try {
        const module = await import(
          `react-syntax-highlighter/dist/cjs/languages/prism/${_language}`
        );
        SyntaxHighlighter.registerLanguage(_language, module.default);
      } catch (error) {
        console.error(
          `Error importing language module for ${_language}:`,
          error
        );
      }
    })();
  }

  return (
    <SyntaxHighlighter
      children={"use reflex::events::Events;"}
      language={_language}
      style={resolvedColorMode === "light" ? oneLight : oneDark}
    />
  );
}

Why can't this be a static import?

[ElijahAhianyo]

This fails:

component_map={
    "codeblock": lambda value, **props: rx.text(
        "Props: ", props, ". Value: ", value
    ),
},

this should be fixed now

[ElijahAhianyo]

It seems using markdown with this always imports python syntax highlighting even when no python block is there, why is that?

I think its coming from the _get_custom_code in markdown

def _get_custom_code(self) -> str | None:
        hooks = {}
        for _component in self.component_map.values():
            comp = _component(_MOCK_ARG)
            hooks.update(comp._get_all_hooks_internal())
            hooks.update(comp._get_all_hooks())

Moving the syntaxhighlighter language registration logic into the CodeBlock as a hook means when extracting all hooks from a component, it includes the code block hook with the default set language (python).
I think a way to get around that was a condition to exclude hooks from the CodeBlock component and one way to do that was to modify the _get_all_hooks API to accept a list of component types to ignore when getting hooks of its children, but we cant do that without a breaking change. Alternatively, I thought we could implement a modified version of the _get_all_hooks here (i.e, going down the tree to exclude the CodeBlock component here without calling comp._get_all_hooks)