Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Workaround for Math variadic functions #82
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Workaround for Math variadic functions #82
Changes from 4 commits
f111fd7
41fc71e
3910add
8f64689
2219eba
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure the
float
versions ought to be overridden.Math.min([])
does indeed return0
, andMath.min()
returnsInfinity
, butMath.minMany([1, 2, 3])
maps toMath.min(1, 2, 3)
, notMath.min([1, 2, 3])
, and so it seems more consistent to haveMath.minMany([])
map toMath.min()
, notMath.min([])
.These are also edge cases that are very unlikely to occur in practice, since variadic calls require syntactic arrays there's little chance of it happening by accident. I'd suggest the aim of this is restricted to just making the types sound.