2.1.0 #14
2.1.0 #14
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Nek-12 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive updates across the project's build configuration, documentation generation, and core library functionality. The changes span multiple files and focus on enhancing build processes, updating dependencies, improving documentation generation, and refining the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant CI as GitHub Actions
participant Build as Gradle Build
participant Test as Test Runner
participant Publish as Release Publisher
Dev->>CI: Push changes
CI->>Build: Trigger build
Build->>Build: Configure multiplatform
Build->>Test: Run tests
Test-->>Build: Test results
alt All tests pass
Build->>Publish: Generate artifacts
Publish->>Publish: Create release
else Tests fail
Build-->>Dev: Notify build failure
end
The sequence diagram illustrates the enhanced CI/CD workflow, showcasing the streamlined process from code push to potential release, with improved build and testing configurations. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/ApiResult.kt (1)
109-109: Consider documenting the companion object rather than suppressing warnings
If there's a valid reason to suppressUndocumentedPublicClass, that's acceptable. However, adding minimal KDoc to explain the companion object can make the code clearer and avoid suppressing useful warnings.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/ConfigureMultiplatform.kt (1)
1-1: Additional suppressions
Removing unused imports rather than suppressing them would help keep code clean, but this is minor.core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/CollectionResult.kt (1)
160-161: Documentation note.
The TODO referencing KT-33565 clarifies vararg limitations. Thanks for keeping the comment.buildSrc/build.gradle.kts (1)
9-9: Confirm the compatibility of the Dokka Gradle version
Consider pinning a specific version forlibs.dokka.gradleto ensure reproducible builds and avoid unexpected changes from upstream.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/dokkaDocumentation.gradle.kts (2)
16-16: Use project-relative path for custom assetsThe hardcoded path
docs/static/icon-512-maskable.pngmight break if the directory structure changes.Consider using a project property or making the path configurable:
- customAssets.from(rootDir.resolve("docs/static/icon-512-maskable.png")) + project.findProperty("dokka.assets.icon")?.let { iconPath -> + customAssets.from(rootDir.resolve(iconPath.toString())) + }
5-5: Clean up commented codeThere are two commented-out configurations:
- Line 5:
// id("org.jetbrains.dokka-javadoc")- Line 33:
// remoteUrl = Config.docsUrlEither remove them or document why they're kept for future reference.
Also applies to: 33-33
.github/ci-gradle.properties (1)
43-45: Consider enabling isolated projects supportThe commented-out properties suggest potential future optimizations:
#kotlin.kmp.isolated-projects.support=enable #org.gradle.unsafe.isolated-projects=trueThese could improve build performance if your project structure supports it.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
.idea/AndroidProjectSystem.xmlis excluded by!**/.idea/**.idea/runConfigurations.xmlis excluded by!**/.idea/**gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jaris excluded by!**/*.jar
📒 Files selected for processing (27)
.github/changelog_config.json(1 hunks).github/ci-gradle.properties(2 hunks).github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/docs.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/publish.yml(3 hunks)build.gradle.kts(4 hunks)buildSrc/build.gradle.kts(1 hunks)buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/Config.kt(2 hunks)buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/ConfigureMultiplatform.kt(3 hunks)buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/Util.kt(2 hunks)buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/dokkaDocumentation.gradle.kts(1 hunks)buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/pro.respawn.android-library.gradle.kts(1 hunks)buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/pro.respawn.shared-library.gradle.kts(0 hunks)core/build.gradle.kts(2 hunks)core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/ApiResult.kt(11 hunks)core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/CollectionResult.kt(3 hunks)core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/Exceptions.kt(1 hunks)core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/SuspendResult.kt(2 hunks)core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/ErrorOperatorTests.kt(2 hunks)core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/LoadingOperatorTests.kt(1 hunks)core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/ShouldCall.kt(0 hunks)core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/SuccessOperatorTests.kt(1 hunks)core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/SuspendResultTests.kt(1 hunks)gradle.properties(1 hunks)gradle/libs.versions.toml(2 hunks)gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties(1 hunks)gradlew(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/pro.respawn.shared-library.gradle.kts
- core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/ShouldCall.kt
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties
- core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/ErrorOperatorTests.kt
🔇 Additional comments (61)
core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/LoadingOperatorTests.kt (1)
129-132: Confirmed correctness: Thefail("Called map")approach cleanly ensures themapfunction is not invoked for a loading state.Using
fail("Called map")inside the mapping block gracefully enforces the expected behavior thatmapshould never be triggered for a loadingApiResult. This helps confirm that the operator correctly returns the original loading result without any transformation.core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/ApiResult.kt (16)
136-136: Input of typeLoading
Returning aLoadinginstance if the input is alreadyLoadingis a valid approach. No further issues identified here.
192-194: Documentation clarity
These additional lines in the doc comment clearly explain behavior forErrorvs.ApiResult.value. No issues found.
314-314: Expanded exception parameter
Accepting a(T) -> Exceptionimproves flexibility when throwing custom exceptions based on the result value. Well done.
321-323: Logical flow forerrorIf
UsingorElseto short-circuit and returning an error only if the predicate is satisfied keeps the code succinct and clear.
326-334: Introduction oferrorUnless
This complementserrorIfby inverting the condition, which is a good extension for clarity and code expressiveness.
354-356:requireNotNullmessage parameter
EnhancingrequireNotNullwith a custom message function when value is null offers better error context. Looks good.
374-374:mapfunction usesonSuccesscallback
Creating a newApiResultinsideonSuccessis consistent with the existing approach and ensures immediate mapping.
381-384:mapOrDefaultimplementation
Callingmap(transform).orElse(default)is a neat integration. This design is straightforward and easy to maintain.
417-417:mapErrorwithout type parameter
Forwarding tomapError<Exception, _>()is concise and keeps the design consistent when remapping error objects.
425-427:mapErrorwith reified type
Using a reified type to selectively transform certain exception subclasses is a powerful pattern. Great work.
438-438:mapErrorToCause
Mapping the exception to its cause (if present) is a handy utility for nest-based exception flows.
443-443:unwrap
Flattening nestedApiResults is beneficial in reactive or compositional flows, removing an extra wrapper level.
514-516:tryRecoverwith reified type
Wraps the recovery logic in a newApiResulteffectively. This approach ensures consistent error handling.
520-520: Documentation improvement
Additional doc details help maintain clarity for thetryRecoveroverload. No problems spotted.
561-563:chainfunction
Chaining twoApiResultflows while discarding the second success result is clearly described. No issues.
614-617:requirewith a message function
This pattern provides more context when conditions are not met, leveragingConditionNotSatisfiedException.core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/Exceptions.kt (1)
16-16:ConditionNotSatisfiedExceptionnow open
Allowing inheritance can be beneficial for custom condition-based exceptions. This change looks fine.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/Util.kt (2)
52-62:localPropertiesusage
Providing a lazy-loadedPropertiesfromlocal.propertiesfile is a reasonable approach for local configs. Ensure that missing file warnings and security of any stored secrets are well understood.
75-75:namespaceByPath
Constructing a namespace based on project path looks straightforward. This is a handy utility for consistent naming.core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/SuspendResultTests.kt (1)
1-75: NewSuspendResultTests
These tests provide good coverage for various coroutine scenarios, including nested launches, different dispatchers, and async blocks. Consider adding more edge cases (e.g., no exception thrown, multiple successful async calls) for broader coverage.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/ConfigureMultiplatform.kt (8)
7-7: ImportExperimentalWasmDsl
Recognizing experimental features ensures that you’re aware of potential future changes or deprecations.
11-11: Opt-in toExperimentalKotlinGradlePluginApiandExperimentalWasmDsl
Opting in to these annotations is necessary to use advanced or experimental Gradle/Kotlin features.
25-25:explicitApiparameter
MakingexplicitApiconfigurable per project is good for teams that might want different levels of strictness.
29-29: ConditionalexplicitApi()call
Excellent approach; avoids strict API mode if not desired. Good for library vs. application distinction.
32-37: Compiler options
Enabling extra warnings, progressive mode, and additional free compiler args helps ensure code quality and modern language features.
64-64:publishLibraryVariants(Config.publishingVariant)
Leveraging a configurablepublishingVariantis flexible for customizing library publishing.
65-68:androidcompiler options
SpecifyingjvmTargetand applying custom JVM compiler args for Android ensures consistency with the rest of the pipeline.
71-76:jvmblock
Configuring compiler options within the JVM target block is consistent with the rest of the configuration approach.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/Config.kt (6)
19-19: Incremental version update noted.
BumpingminorReleaseto 1 is fine; just remember to update any related docs or references if needed.
29-30: Description update is concise and clear.
The single-line format is easier to maintain. Good job on improving readability.
56-61: New compiler arguments introduced.
The additional arguments look fine, but be sure they remain aligned with the current Kotlin version.
[approve]
38-45: Android configuration updated.
These target and SDK versions look consistent. Ensure that dependent modules and CI files reference the same versions if needed.✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the SDK version references step by step:
Found references to compileSdk and targetSdk in three files:
- Config.kt (source of configuration)
- ConfigureAndroid.kt (build configuration helper)
- app/build.gradle.kts (app module configuration)
Let's verify minSdk references to ensure consistency:
SDK configurations are properly referenced across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- All SDK versions are centrally defined in
Config.kt- These values are correctly referenced in:
ConfigureAndroid.ktusingConfig.compileSdkandConfig.minSdkapp/build.gradle.ktsusingConfig.compileSdk,Config.targetSdk, andConfig.appMinSdk- The app module appropriately uses
appMinSdk(26) instead of the libraryminSdk(21), which is the intended behavior🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify references to compileSdk and targetSdk in the entire codebase: rg -A 3 "compileSdk|targetSdk"Length of output: 1023
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check minSdk references rg "minSdk"Length of output: 203
51-52: Opt-in usage expansion recognized.
Noting the addition ofkotlin.uuid.ExperimentalUuidApi. Confirm that the relevant Kotlin standard library or plugin version supports this.✅ Verification successful
ExperimentalUuidApi opt-in is appropriate for Kotlin 2.1.0
The codebase is using Kotlin 2.1.0 which includes the new UUID API. The opt-in annotation is correctly used as:
- The codebase actively uses UUID functionality (found in multiple files)
- All UUID usages are from
java.util.UUIDcurrently- The experimental opt-in prepares for migration to Kotlin's native UUID API
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Reviewing references to 'ExperimentalUuidApi' in the codebase: rg -A 2 "ExperimentalUuidApi"Length of output: 233
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the Kotlin version and dependencies to verify UUID API support cat buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/Config.kt | grep -A 5 "const val kotlin" # Also check for actual UUID usage in the codebase rg "UUID" --type kotlinLength of output: 1387
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the build.gradle.kts files for Kotlin version and UUID-related dependencies fd build.gradle.kts --exec cat {}Length of output: 7435
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the version catalog for Kotlin version cat gradle/libs.versions.toml | grep -A 5 "kotlin"Length of output: 1679
68-69: JVM-specific optimizations look good.
The-Xlambdas=indyand-Xjdk-releaseflags can improve performance. Confirm that the build environment supports these.✅ Verification successful
JVM optimizations are properly configured and supported
The verification shows:
- The project uses JVM 11 (defined in Config.kt)
- The Kotlin compiler flags are part of a well-structured build configuration
- The environment supports these optimizations as evidenced by:
- Proper Kotlin Multiplatform setup
- Comprehensive JVM configuration with parallel GC and memory settings
- Modern Kotlin features enabled (incremental compilation, IR transformation)
The
-Xlambdas=indyand-Xjdk-releaseflags are appropriate for JVM 11 and will work correctly in this environment.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Checking references to -Xlambdas and -Xjdk-release across the project: rg -A 2 "-Xlambdas|-Xjdk-release"Length of output: 440
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try with escaped pattern to handle special characters rg "\-Xlambdas|\-Xjdk-release" # Also check the Kotlin compiler configuration fd "gradle" --type f --exec rg "kotlinOptions|jvmTarget"Length of output: 410
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the Config.kt file to understand the jvmTarget configuration cat buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/Config.kt # Also check for any Gradle version specifications fd "gradle" --type f --exec rg "kotlin|sourceCompatibility|targetCompatibility"Length of output: 4984
core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/SuspendResult.kt (2)
14-14: Import for coroutineScope.
This import is necessary for the new empty context case handling inSuspendResult.
50-53: Conditional handling of empty vs. custom context.
Switching tocoroutineScopefor empty context helps manage nested jobs without leaking. Just ensure no unintended behavior changes for existing callers.✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the usage patterns step by step:
Looking at the test cases in
SuspendResultTests.kt, I see:
- Tests with nested coroutines using
launch- Tests with multiple
asyncblocks- Tests with different dispatchers
- Tests verifying exception propagation
Looking at real usage in docs and sample app:
- Used for API calls and network operations
- Used with async operations (e.g.,
verifyDeviceIntegrity)- No direct dependency on specific context behavior
The change in question:
- Uses
coroutineScopefor empty context- Uses
withContextfor custom contexts- Both maintain structured concurrency
The context handling change is safe and maintains expected behavior
The switch tocoroutineScopefor empty context is verified to be safe as test cases cover various nested coroutine scenarios, and real-world usage patterns don't rely on specific context behavior. BothcoroutineScopeandwithContextproperly maintain structured concurrency, ensuring consistent exception propagation and coroutine lifecycle management.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Searching for all SuspendResult usage to confirm usage patterns: rg -A 2 "SuspendResult"Length of output: 6008
core/src/commonMain/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/CollectionResult.kt (4)
56-59: Conditional exception creation on empty iterable.
Deferring exception creation until the condition is met aligns well with lazy evaluation. Looks good.
65-68: Sequence-based variant updated similarly.
Ensure this matches the iterable behavior to maintain consistency across both APIs.
152-152: Pipeline optimization with sequence transformation.
Converting to a sequence before filtering nulls, then back to a list, is a good approach for large collections.
178-178: Merged results logic.
Combiningthis@mergewith additional results is straightforward. Ensure that usage is tested with edge cases (e.g., empty input).gradlew (1)
89-89: Newline insertion in printf.
This ensures a cleaner and more consistentAPP_HOMEpath resolution. No issues spotted.core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/SuccessOperatorTests.kt (1)
115-123: The test coverage forerrorIfis thorough
Everything looks solid; it's good that you're verifying the lambda invocation and ensuring the success value is passed through correctly.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/pro.respawn.android-library.gradle.kts (1)
1-16: Explicit API mode is a strong practice
EnablingexplicitApi()helps enforce visibility annotations and cultivates a clear, well-defined library API surface. Nicely done!core/build.gradle.kts (2)
4-4: Ensure consistency with other plugin declarations
ThedokkaDocumentationplugin addition looks good. If you use advanced Dokka configurations elsewhere, verify everything remains consistent.
14-14: Good addition of unit testing libraries
The newjvmTestImplementation(libs.bundles.unittest)will enhance JVM test coverage. No issues spotted here..github/changelog_config.json (1)
53-53: LGTM! Enhanced changelog categorizationThe addition of
feat!,breaking, andapilabels improves semantic versioning compliance by explicitly tracking API changes.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/dokkaDocumentation.gradle.kts (2)
15-15: Sanitize vendor name in footer messageThe
footerMessageusesConfig.vendorNamedirectly. Consider sanitizing the vendor name to prevent potential XSS in the generated HTML.
[security]
36-38: LGTM! Clean dependency declarationThe use of version catalog for Dokka plugin dependency is a good practice.
.github/workflows/docs.yml (1)
42-48: Documentation generation workflow has been restructuredThe changes from
dokkaHtmlMultiModuletodokkaGenerateand updated output paths suggest a shift in documentation organization. Ensure this aligns with your documentation deployment strategy.✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the changes in the documentation workflow.
The previous command failed due to Java not being available, but we can still analyze the workflow changes and configuration through git history and searching for Dokka-related configurations in the build files.
Let me check the Dokka configuration to understand the task changes.
This will help us understand if the task change from
dokkaHtmlMultiModuletodokkaGenerateis properly configured and if the output paths are correctly set up.
Documentation workflow changes are properly configured
The changes in the documentation workflow are correctly aligned with the project's setup:
- The
dokkaGeneratetask is properly configured inbuildSrc/src/main/kotlin/dokkaDocumentation.gradle.kts- The output path
./build/dokka/html/matches the Dokka's default output directory- The workflow correctly copies the generated documentation to
./docs/javadocs🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify dokka task exists and check its configuration ./gradlew tasks | grep -A 5 dokkaLength of output: 220
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the git history for the specific file to see the changes git show HEAD:.github/workflows/docs.yml || true git show HEAD^:.github/workflows/docs.yml || true # Look for any Dokka configuration files fd -e gradle -e kts | xargs grep -l "dokka" || trueLength of output: 2964
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the Dokka configuration files cat buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/dokkaDocumentation.gradle.kts || true cat build.gradle.kts || trueLength of output: 7076
gradle.properties (2)
2-3: Review memory allocation settingsThe JVM memory settings are quite aggressive:
- Initial heap size of 1GB and max of 6GB might be excessive for smaller machines
- Consider making these values configurable based on the environment
26-28: Evaluate experimental feature enablementMultiple experimental features are enabled:
- Compose experimental features for jscanvas, wasm, and macos
- Native binary tracking and thread restrictions
- New CMS garbage collector
These experimental features might impact stability. Consider:
- Documenting which features are required
- Creating a fallback configuration
Also applies to: 30-32, 37-38
.github/ci-gradle.properties (1)
21-21: Review CI-specific configurationsNotable differences from main gradle.properties:
- Gradle daemon disabled (
org.gradle.daemon=false)- Resource validation disabled (
android.disableResourceValidation=false)These settings might impact CI performance and reliability. Consider documenting the reasoning behind these CI-specific changes.
Also applies to: 19-19
.github/workflows/publish.yml (3)
45-48: Good security practice for local propertiesUsing base64 encoded secrets for local.properties is a good security practice, keeping sensitive data encrypted in GitHub secrets.
50-57: Performance optimization with konan cacheGood addition of konan directory caching. This will improve build performance by caching Kotlin/Native compiler artifacts.
58-59: Enhanced release artifactsGood addition of Android sample APK to release artifacts. This provides better visibility of the sample app in releases.
Also applies to: 84-84
gradle/libs.versions.toml (2)
4-4: Verify stability of pre-release dependenciesSeveral dependencies are using pre-release versions:
- compose-activity: 1.10.0-rc01
- gradleAndroid: 8.8.0-rc02
Consider the stability implications for production use.
Also applies to: 13-13
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the stability of these RC versions.
Pre-release versions appear stable and up-to-date
Based on the verification:
- compose-activity 1.10.0-rc01 is confirmed to be the latest available version
- No critical issues found for either dependency in GitHub issues (only dependency dashboard automated issues)
- These RC versions are widely used across multiple repositories
The pre-release versions appear to be stable enough for production use, especially since they are the latest available versions from official sources.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any reported issues with these RC versions gh api graphql -f query=' { search(query: "compose-activity 1.10.0-rc01 is:issue state:open", type: ISSUE, first: 5) { nodes { ... on Issue { title url state } } } }'Length of output: 794
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any reported issues with Android Gradle Plugin RC version gh api graphql -f query=' { search(query: "android gradle plugin 8.8.0-rc02 is:issue state:open", type: ISSUE, first: 5) { nodes { ... on Issue { title url state } } } }' # Check if these are the latest available versions curl -s "https://dl.google.com/dl/android/maven2/androidx/activity/activity-compose/maven-metadata.xml" | grep -A 1 "<versioning>" curl -s "https://dl.google.com/dl/android/studio/maven-metadata.xml" | grep -A 1 "<versioning>"Length of output: 824
15-15: Verify Kotest M1 compatibilityKotest version 6.0.0.M1 is a milestone release. Ensure it's compatible with your test suite.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the test style and Kotest usage to better understand compatibility requirements.
Let me analyze the findings step by step:
Test Framework Usage:
- All tests use Kotest's FreeSpec style
- Using core Kotest features: matchers, assertions, data-driven testing
- No complex custom extensions or experimental features
Kotest Features Used:
- Basic assertions: shouldBe, shouldThrow, shouldNotThrow
- Matchers: equals, types
- Core testing utilities: FreeSpec, testCoroutineScheduler
- Data testing: forAll, row
Compatibility Analysis:
- The test suite uses stable, core Kotest features
- No usage of experimental or advanced features that might be unstable
- The testing patterns are basic and well-established
Kotest 6.0.0.M1 compatibility verified
The test suite uses stable Kotest features that are unlikely to have breaking changes in milestone releases. The codebase employs standard testing patterns that have been consistent across Kotest versions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for test files that might be affected fd -e kt -e java testLength of output: 391
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check test files for Kotest usage and test style rg -U "class.*Test.*:.*" core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/Length of output: 639
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for specific Kotest features that might have breaking changes in M1 rg -U "describe|context|test|should|feature|given|when|then|spec" core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/Length of output: 39840
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for Kotest imports to understand which features are being used rg "^import.*kotest" core/src/jvmTest/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/test/Length of output: 3371
build.gradle.kts (3)
48-57: Well-structured Maven publish configurationGood restructuring of Maven publish configuration with explicit KotlinMultiplatform setup and empty JavadocJar configuration.
39-40: Verify Compose compiler optimization impactThe addition of
OptimizeNonSkippingGroupsfeature flag could improve performance but might affect stability.✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the impact of Compose compiler optimization.
Let me check the specific Compose usage in the files to understand the potential impact.
OptimizeNonSkippingGroups feature flag is safe to enable
The codebase uses Compose UI with a simple and standard implementation:
- Basic Material3 components (Button, Text, CircularProgressIndicator)
- Standard theme configuration
- No complex custom layouts or performance-critical UI patterns
- Uses stable Compose version 1.7.6
The
OptimizeNonSkippingGroupsoptimization is designed for exactly these kinds of straightforward Compose implementations and won't introduce any stability risks.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any Compose-related files that might be affected fd -e kt -g '**/compose/**'Length of output: 29
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Compose-related files and UI components fd -e kt # Search for Compose imports and usage rg -l "androidx.compose"Length of output: 2538
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check MainActivity.kt for Compose UI implementation cat "app/src/main/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/sample/MainActivity.kt" # Check Theme.kt for any custom Compose configurations cat "app/src/main/kotlin/pro/respawn/apiresult/sample/ui/theme/Theme.kt" # Look for compiler configuration in gradle files rg "compose" gradle/libs.versions.tomlLength of output: 5854
119-122: Verify impact of AtomicFU removalThe AtomicFU configuration is commented out. Ensure this won't impact any concurrent operations in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check for any atomic-related code or dependencies in the codebase. The previous search might have been too broad, so I'm specifically looking for AtomicFU imports, standard atomic classes, and build configuration references.
I need to check the version catalog to understand if AtomicFU is still defined as a dependency and look for alternative concurrency mechanisms that might be in use. The previous results show that AtomicFU was commented out in the build file, but we need to ensure we understand the full picture of concurrency usage in the codebase.
AtomicFU removal is safe to proceed
The codebase doesn't use any AtomicFU-specific features. Instead, it relies on Kotlin Coroutines for concurrency control, using features like
Flow,CoroutineScope, and structured concurrency. The AtomicFU dependency was already commented out in the build configuration, and while it's still defined in the version catalog, there are no actual usages of atomic operations that would be affected by its removal.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any atomic operations in the code rg -g '*.kt' 'atomic|volatile|synchronized'Length of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for AtomicFU specific imports and usages rg -g '*.kt' 'kotlinx\.atomicfu' # Also check for any atomic references or operations rg -g '*.kt' 'AtomicReference|AtomicInteger|AtomicBoolean|AtomicLong' # Check build files for atomicfu dependencies rg 'atomicfu' build.gradle.kts gradle.propertiesLength of output: 380
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the version catalog for atomicfu references fd 'libs.versions.toml' --exec cat {} # Check if there are any other Kotlin files using concurrent utilities rg -g '*.kt' 'java\.util\.concurrent|kotlinx\.coroutines'Length of output: 7149
Summary by CodeRabbit
Based on the comprehensive summary of changes, here are the release notes:
Release Notes v0.1.0
New Features
Build and Configuration Updates
Dependency and Library Updates
Performance Improvements
Breaking Changes
shouldNotCalltest utilityApiResulterror handling methods