chore: release #229
Open
chore: release #229
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
…s mapped to resourceName like bufferedFields and timestampFields come in as a single object per resource so should requiredFields. Why should one provied a complete map of requiredFields but then only the entry for one resource is used. I keep it backward compatible but in the future requiredFields is expected to be a decicated object
…dition and use better filter
Arun-KumarH
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Release Changes
like bufferedFields and timestampFields come in as a single object per resource so should
requiredFields. Why should one provied a complete map of requiredFields but then only the entry for
one resource is used. I keep it backward compatible but in the future requiredFields is expected to
be a decicated object
1.6.4 (v1.6.3...v1.6.4) (2024-11-18)
Bug Fixes
Approve this PR to release above packages!