generated from riscv/docs-spec-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix observing CHERI execution mode code #506
Draft
James-Williams
wants to merge
1
commit into
riscv:main
Choose a base branch
from
James-Williams:main
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -36,5 +36,6 @@ This RISC-V specification has been contributed to directly or indirectly by: | |
* Ricki Tura <[email protected]> | ||
* Robert N. M. Watson <[email protected]> | ||
* Toby Wenman <[email protected]> | ||
* Jay Williams <[email protected]> | ||
* Jonathan Woodruff <[email protected]> | ||
* Jason Zhijingcheng Yu <[email protected]> |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is wrong though. AUIPC in integer mode gives you an integer not a capability. Hence the use of GCTAG to determine whether you got an integer or a capability.
Of course, the elephant in the room is that you've had to tell your assembler what mode you're in in order to assemble it in the first place, and if you lie to your assembler then generally speaking all bets are off (e.g. with RVC enabled it'll compress some instructions to encodings that mean different things between RV32 and RV64). Generally speaking you should never do this, and you'll always know what mode you're in anyway based on your execution environment. However, just as the privileged spec mentions how to probe XLEN (which has exactly the same, if not more, dodginess when it comes to running code assembled for one base ISA on another), I guess it's ok to have something here. But this may be worth (a) a disclaimer reminding people this is bad practice and dangerous (b) explaining why it's GCTAG (and that AUIPC is the integer form in integer mode).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yep - this needs gctag instead. I guess this needs some words somewhere in the spec to clarify (I remember this came up recently - maybe it's just in an issue)