feat: add remote run SDK layer#234
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
@roackb2/heddle/hostedand@roackb2/heddle/remotepackage entrypointsConversationRunServicethrough/hostedwithout duplicating its implementationBoundary
This slice deliberately does not choose HTTP, SSE, tRPC, WebSocket, React, authentication, or multi-process delivery. It establishes the reusable hosted and remote domain layers first; concrete transport kits can compose them in a later slice once their residual adapter boundary is clear.
Developer impact
Hosts can now make their assumptions explicit:
The root
ConversationRunServiceexport remains available for compatibility.Validation
yarn lintyarn typecheckyarn test— 635 unit and 290 integration testsyarn build/hostedand/remotenpm pack --dry-run --cache /tmp/heddle-npm-cache