Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix sequence counting #34

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 4.x
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Fix sequence counting #34

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

msmakouz
Copy link
Member

@msmakouz msmakouz commented Oct 21, 2024

Q A
Bugfix? ✔️
Breaks BC?
New feature?

See: #31

@msmakouz msmakouz added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 21, 2024
@msmakouz msmakouz self-assigned this Oct 21, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

A new PHP file named swoole.php has been added to demonstrate the integration of the Spiral Goridge package with Swoole coroutines. In addition, significant modifications have been made to the AbstractRPC, MultiRPC, and RPC classes to replace static sequence management with instance-based management. This includes the introduction of a new property $sequence and the deprecation of the static property $seq. Furthermore, a new test method testCallSequence has been added to validate the sequence of calls in the RPC test class.

Changes

File Change Summary
examples/swoole.php New file created demonstrating Spiral Goridge integration with Swoole coroutines.
src/RPC/AbstractRPC.php Added protected property $sequence, deprecated static property $seq, updated method calls to use global namespace.
src/RPC/MultiRPC.php Removed static property $seq, added instance property $sequence, updated methods to manage sequence as an instance.
src/RPC/RPC.php Updated constructor parameter formatting, changed sequence management from static to instance-based in the call method.
tests/Goridge/RPC.php Added new test method testCallSequence, imported Frame class to support the new test functionality.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Swoole
    participant Goridge

    Client->>Swoole: Start Coroutine
    Swoole->>Goridge: Create RPC Instance
    Goridge->>Goridge: Call App.Hi('Antony')
    Goridge-->>Swoole: Return Result
    Swoole-->>Client: Output Result
Loading

🐰 "In the land of code where rabbits play,
New files and changes hop in today.
With sequences now in a cozy nest,
Each call is a leap, each test is a quest!
So let’s celebrate with joy and cheer,
For every new feature brings us near!" 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@msmakouz msmakouz marked this pull request as draft October 21, 2024 10:57
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
examples/swoole.php (2)

14-17: Consider using more specific Swoole hook flags.

While using SWOOLE_HOOK_ALL ensures all possible hooks are enabled, it might be overly broad for your specific use case. Consider using more targeted hook flags to potentially improve performance.

The use of the barrier for synchronization is a good practice for managing concurrent coroutines.

You might want to replace SWOOLE_HOOK_ALL with a combination of specific flags that are necessary for your use case. For example:

Co::set(['hook_flags' => SWOOLE_HOOK_TCP | SWOOLE_HOOK_UDP | SWOOLE_HOOK_UNIX]);

Adjust the flags based on your specific requirements.


24-26: LGTM: Proper use of barrier and overall structure.

The use of Barrier::wait($barrier) ensures all coroutines complete before the script exits, which is a good practice. The overall structure using Co\Run is correct for Swoole coroutine usage.

For improved clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the barrier wait:

// Wait for all coroutines to complete before exiting
Barrier::wait($barrier);
tests/Goridge/RPC.php (1)

253-304: LGTM: New test method testCallSequence added.

The new test method thoroughly verifies the sequence of calls made to the RPC service, ensuring that each call increments the sequence number correctly. It aligns well with the changes made to use instance-based sequence management in the core RPC classes.

A minor suggestion for improvement:

Consider adding assertions to verify the return values of the call method invocations. This would provide an additional layer of verification to ensure that the responses are correctly processed.

Example:

$result = $conn1->call('Service.Process', ['Name' => 'foo', 'Value' => 18]);
$this->assertEquals(expected_result, $result);
src/RPC/MultiRPC.php (1)

Line range hint 153-193: Thread-safety concern with instance-based sequence management

Replacing the static sequence variable with an instance variable may introduce issues in concurrent environments. If multiple threads or coroutines share the same MultiRPC instance, the sequence number may not be thread-safe, leading to race conditions.

Consider using a thread-safe mechanism for sequence incrementation, such as synchronization locks or atomic operations, or ensure that each thread uses its own MultiRPC instance.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8fe68b0 and 7c6d994.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • examples/swoole.php (1 hunks)
  • src/RPC/AbstractRPC.php (3 hunks)
  • src/RPC/MultiRPC.php (3 hunks)
  • src/RPC/RPC.php (2 hunks)
  • tests/Goridge/RPC.php (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (13)
examples/swoole.php (1)

1-13: LGTM: File structure and namespace declarations are well-organized.

The file follows PHP best practices with strict type declarations and proper namespace imports. The structure is clean and easy to understand.

src/RPC/RPC.php (3)

18-18: LGTM: Improved parameter formatting.

The constructor parameter formatting change for $codec improves consistency with other method signatures in the file. This change doesn't affect the functionality and enhances code readability.


Line range hint 46-53: LGTM: No changes needed for the create method.

The create method remains unchanged and is consistent with the new instance-based sequence management approach. It creates a new instance of the class, which will have its own $sequence property, aligning with the recent changes.


Line range hint 1-53: Summary: Improved sequence management addresses PR objectives.

The changes in this file successfully transition from static to instance-based sequence management, addressing the PR objective of fixing sequence counting. This improvement enhances thread-safety and allows for better handling of concurrent RPC instances.

The modifications are consistent with similar changes in other RPC classes mentioned in the AI summary, indicating a systematic approach to resolving the issue across the codebase.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify that similar changes have been made in related files:

src/RPC/AbstractRPC.php (5)

22-22: LGTM: Clear deprecation notice added.

The deprecation notice for $seq is clear and provides guidance on using $this->sequence instead. This change aligns with the PR objective of fixing sequence counting.


26-29: LGTM: New $sequence property added.

The addition of the $sequence property as a protected integer initialized to 1 is appropriate. This change implements instance-based sequence management, addressing the issue mentioned in the PR objectives.


66-73: LGTM: Global namespace function calls used.

The use of backslash-prefixed function calls (\substr, \sprintf) ensures that the global namespace versions are used. This change improves code reliability by avoiding potential conflicts with user-defined functions.


85-89: LGTM: Instance-based sequence management implemented.

The changes in the packFrame method are appropriate:

  1. The use of \ucfirst is consistent with the global namespace function calls in other parts of the code.
  2. The replacement of self::$seq with $this->sequence correctly implements instance-based sequence management.
  3. The use of \strlen is also consistent with the global namespace function calls.

These changes align with the PR objective of fixing sequence counting.


Line range hint 22-89: Summary: Successful implementation of instance-based sequence management.

The changes in this file successfully address the PR objective of fixing sequence counting:

  1. The static $seq property is deprecated with a clear notice.
  2. A new instance-based $sequence property is introduced.
  3. All relevant method calls now use $this->sequence instead of self::$seq.
  4. Global namespace function calls are consistently used throughout the file.

These changes improve the reliability and maintainability of the code while addressing the sequence counting issue. The implementation is clean and consistent.

tests/Goridge/RPC.php (2)

9-9: LGTM: New import added for Frame class.

The addition of the Frame class import is necessary for the new test method and is correctly placed.


Line range hint 1-305: Summary: Excellent addition of sequence testing.

The changes in this file effectively address the PR objective of fixing sequence counting. The new testCallSequence method provides comprehensive coverage for the instance-based sequence management implemented in the core RPC classes. This test ensures that multiple RPC instances can maintain their own sequences correctly, which is crucial for the reliability of the RPC communication.

The implementation is clean, well-structured, and aligns perfectly with the project's testing practices. Great job on improving the test coverage!

src/RPC/MultiRPC.php (2)

168-170: Ensure consistent sequence incrementation

After assigning $seq = $this->sequence;, you increment $this->sequence++. Verify that this sequencing logic is intentional and that $seq is meant to hold the value prior to incrementation. This ensures that sequence numbers are correctly managed and unique.


191-193: Confirm sequence handling in asynchronous calls

In the callAsync method, $seq is assigned from $this->sequence before incrementing $this->sequence++. Ensure that this pattern maintains the correct sequence numbers for asynchronous operations and doesn't introduce any off-by-one errors.

Comment on lines +18 to +23
go(function () use ($barrier) {
$rpc = new Goridge\RPC\RPC(
Goridge\Relay::create('tcp://127.0.0.1:6001')
);
echo $rpc->call('App.Hi', 'Antony');
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider optimizing RPC usage and improving configuration management.

  1. Creating a new RPC instance for each coroutine might not be the most efficient approach. Consider reusing a single RPC instance across coroutines if possible.

  2. The hardcoded IP and port (tcp://127.0.0.1:6001) could be moved to a configuration variable for better maintainability and flexibility.

  3. The direct echo of the RPC call result doesn't allow for proper error handling or output formatting. Consider wrapping this in a try-catch block and formatting the output.

Here's a suggested refactor:

$config = [
    'rpc_address' => 'tcp://127.0.0.1:6001',
    'num_coroutines' => 3,
];

$rpc = new Goridge\RPC\RPC(Goridge\Relay::create($config['rpc_address']));

for ($i = 0; $i < $config['num_coroutines']; $i++) {
    go(function () use ($rpc, $barrier) {
        try {
            $result = $rpc->call('App.Hi', 'Antony');
            echo "Coroutine " . Co::getCid() . " result: " . $result . PHP_EOL;
        } catch (\Exception $e) {
            echo "Coroutine " . Co::getCid() . " error: " . $e->getMessage() . PHP_EOL;
        }
    });
}

This refactored version improves configuration management, reuses the RPC instance, and adds basic error handling and output formatting.

Comment on lines +35 to 41
if ($frame->options[0] !== $this->sequence) {
throw new RPCException('Invalid RPC frame, sequence mismatch');
}

self::$seq++;
$this->sequence++;

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Approve instance-based sequence management, but address inconsistency.

The changes from self::$seq to $this->sequence improve encapsulation and allow for better handling of concurrent RPC instances. This aligns with similar changes in other RPC classes.

However, there's an inconsistency:

The line self::$seq++; should be removed as it's no longer needed and inconsistent with the new instance-based approach.

Apply this diff to resolve the issue:

 if ($frame->options[0] !== $this->sequence) {
     throw new RPCException('Invalid RPC frame, sequence mismatch');
 }

-self::$seq++;
 $this->sequence++;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if ($frame->options[0] !== $this->sequence) {
throw new RPCException('Invalid RPC frame, sequence mismatch');
}
self::$seq++;
$this->sequence++;
if ($frame->options[0] !== $this->sequence) {
throw new RPCException('Invalid RPC frame, sequence mismatch');
}
$this->sequence++;

Comment on lines +153 to +156
$frame = $this->getResponseFromRelay($relay, $this->sequence, true);

self::$seq++;
$this->sequence++;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Initialize $sequence property before usage

The $sequence property is used here but doesn't appear to be initialized in the class. This could lead to undefined behavior or errors due to null or unexpected initial values. Consider initializing $sequence in the constructor.

Apply this diff to initialize $sequence:

 public function __construct(
     array $relays,
     int $asyncBufferThreshold = self::DEFAULT_BUFFER_THRESHOLD,
     CodecInterface $codec = new JsonCodec()
 ) {
+    $this->sequence = 0;
     // existing code...
 }

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants