Skip to content

results(linux-x64): i5-13450hx 20260721 benchmark — RocketRide vs LangChain v0.3.86 performance & isolation analysis - #8

Open
Ramanpreet21 wants to merge 1 commit into
rocketride-org:mainfrom
Ramanpreet21:results/linux-x64-i5-13450hx-20260721
Open

results(linux-x64): i5-13450hx 20260721 benchmark — RocketRide vs LangChain v0.3.86 performance & isolation analysis#8
Ramanpreet21 wants to merge 1 commit into
rocketride-org:mainfrom
Ramanpreet21:results/linux-x64-i5-13450hx-20260721

Conversation

@Ramanpreet21

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Benchmarking RocketRide Engine v3.2.1.30 against LangChain v0.3.86 on Fedora 44 (i5-13450hx, Python 3.14).

Key Findings

  • Performance & Safety: RocketRide completed 64 stateful batch tasks in 0.851s median (7.5x faster than LangChain async serialization at 6.44s) with zero errors, preventing the sqlite3.ProgrammingError and data loss (up to 69%) seen under stock LangChain thread idioms.
  • Authoring Effort: Reduced workflow implementation from 689 lines (LangChain) down to 123 lines (5.6x reduction) with zero imperative concurrency code.
  • Trade-Offs: Identified RocketRide's 8–11s engine startup overhead, IPC serialization overhead on pure stateless I/O, and ~230MB binary footprint relative to pure Python LangChain.

Environment & Run Details

  • OS: Fedora Linux 44 (Kernel 6.x, x86_64)
  • CPU: Intel Core i5-13450HX
  • Runtimes: Python 3.14.0, RocketRide Engine v3.2.1.30, langchain-core v0.3.86

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant