fix #67

[pachadotdev]

No description provided.

[jeroen]

We can probably fix the warning by using int i instead of size_t i in the for loop.

[pachadotdev]

We can probably fix the warning by using int i instead of size_t i in the for loop.

I edited that!

it is practically the same, the number of languages will never create an integer overflow and that the performance impact is zero

[jeroen]

I meant that that way you can keep the langs.size() in the loop and keep the diff very minimal.

[pachadotdev]

I meant that that way you can keep the langs.size() in the loop and keep the diff very minimal.

yes, my PR saves 1 duplicated computation

[pachadotdev]

I meant that that way you can keep the langs.size() in the loop and keep the diff very minimal.

done

[jeroen]

Can you fix the merge conflict

[pachadotdev]

Can you fix the merge conflict

done, thx!