-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Visualizing-ROS-2-Data-With-Foxglove-Studio.rst #5053
base: jazzy
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ | ||
Visualizing ROS 2 data with Foxglove Studio | ||
=========================================== | ||
|
||
`Foxglove Studio <https://foxglove.dev/studio>`__ is an open source visualization and debugging tool for your robotics data. | ||
`Foxglove Studio <https://foxglove.dev/studio>`__ is an open closed source visualization and debugging tool for your robotics data. | ||
|
||
**NOTE: Foxglove Studio is no longer open-source. An open-source alternative that also supports the MCAP file format is** `Rerun.io <https://rerun.io>`__ , **with source code available at https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun.** | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this is the dedicated documentation how to use foxglobe studio with ROS 2. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I concur here. While I think it is fine to mention that Foxglove is closed source and that there are open source alternatives it is pretty unsatisfying that there is no documentation to point the end user to. The Rerun team is pretty friendly, I'll give them a ping. |
||
|
||
It is available in a variety of ways to make development as convenient as possible – it can be run as a standalone desktop app, accessed via your browser, or even self-hosted on your own domain. | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
removing
open source
is correct here, how about the following?