Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Visualizing-ROS-2-Data-With-Foxglove-Studio.rst #5053

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: jazzy
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
Visualizing ROS 2 data with Foxglove Studio
===========================================

`Foxglove Studio <https://foxglove.dev/studio>`__ is an open source visualization and debugging tool for your robotics data.
`Foxglove Studio <https://foxglove.dev/studio>`__ is an open closed source visualization and debugging tool for your robotics data.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removing open source is correct here, how about the following?

Suggested change
`Foxglove Studio <https://foxglove.dev/studio>`__ is an open closed source visualization and debugging tool for your robotics data.
`Foxglove Studio <https://foxglove.dev/studio>`__ is a visualization and observability platform for robotics development.


**NOTE: Foxglove Studio is no longer open-source. An open-source alternative that also supports the MCAP file format is** `Rerun.io <https://rerun.io>`__ , **with source code available at https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun.**
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is the dedicated documentation how to use foxglobe studio with ROS 2.
IMO if we want to introduce rerun, we should have dedicated and whole procedure how to use rerun instead.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I concur here. While I think it is fine to mention that Foxglove is closed source and that there are open source alternatives it is pretty unsatisfying that there is no documentation to point the end user to.

The Rerun team is pretty friendly, I'll give them a ping.


It is available in a variety of ways to make development as convenient as possible – it can be run as a standalone desktop app, accessed via your browser, or even self-hosted on your own domain.

Expand Down