Skip to content

Conversation

@rosemwahlin
Copy link
Contributor

An early commit for feedback before I go down the wrong path. :)

An early code review to keep me from going too far down the wrong track.

Some background:

The user will be told in the hands-on to run codegen to get project files/type files to work with this application. (I'll be adding the Subscriber side next when this code looks reasonable).
The user will be told in the hands-on to edit the Topic names, and the data being written
I know the Application is under-commented, but hopefully the intent is clear.

I'll be working on the Subscriber side next, and moving from Listeners to using a WaitSet.

Also: Should we have javadoc comments before each class and method?

@rosemwahlin rosemwahlin requested a review from kenbrophy March 24, 2020 21:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant