Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: snowpipe streaming category not a warehouse #1778

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

achettyiitr
Copy link
Member

@achettyiitr achettyiitr commented Oct 30, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

  • Moving Snowpipe streaming to the event stream category (setting it as empty).

What is the related Linear task?

  • Resolves PIPE-1684

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated the category field in the Snowpipe Streaming configuration, allowing for an empty string as a valid option, which may improve the accuracy of configuration categorization within the application.
    • Expanded the valid values for the category property in the destination definition schema, enhancing validation and processing of configurations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the db-config.json configuration file for the Snowpipe Streaming destination by changing the category field from "warehouse" to an empty string "". Additionally, the JSON schema for the destination definition is updated to allow the empty string as a valid option in the category property. The overall structure and logic of both the configuration and schema remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/configurations/destinations/snowpipe_streaming/db-config.json Updated category field from "warehouse" to "".
src/schemas/destinations/db-config-schema.json Updated category enum from ["warehouse"] to ["", "warehouse"].

Poem

In the fields of code where rabbits play,
A change was made to brighten the day.
The category shifted, a new path to find,
With empty strings, new tales unwind.
Hops of joy in the config's embrace,
A whimsical dance in the digital space! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc768db and 968a960.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/configurations/destinations/snowpipe_streaming/db-config.json (1 hunks)
  • src/schemas/destinations/db-config-schema.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/configurations/destinations/snowpipe_streaming/db-config.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/schemas/destinations/db-config-schema.json (1)

34-34: LGTM! Verify validation dependencies.

The schema change correctly enables empty category support while maintaining backward compatibility for warehouse destinations.

Let's verify if any validation logic depends on non-empty category values:

✅ Verification successful

Let's examine the validation test file to ensure there are no assumptions about non-empty categories.


Let's check the validation implementation to see how category is handled.


Let's try a broader search for validation-related files and category handling.


Let's examine the validator implementation to ensure there are no category-specific validations.


Schema change is safe to proceed

The validation implementation uses standard JSON Schema validation through AJV without any custom logic for category values. The empty string in the enum is properly handled by the schema validator, and there are no additional constraints or assumptions about non-empty categories in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for validation logic that might assume non-empty category

# Check for category-related validation patterns
rg -g '!*.{json,md}' -i 'category.*warehouse|warehouse.*category' .

# Look for potential validation files
fd -e ts -e js -e go validation

Length of output: 127


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check validation test content for category-related tests
cat test/validation.test.ts

Length of output: 10083


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the validation implementation
fd -e ts -e js validate src/

Length of output: 30


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for validation-related files and category handling
rg -l "validateDestination|validateConfig" src/
rg -l "category.*validate|validate.*category" src/

Length of output: 125


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the validator implementation
cat src/validator/index.ts

Length of output: 3494


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

lvrach
lvrach previously approved these changes Oct 30, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3886598 and ccac5d0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/configurations/destinations/snowpipe_streaming/db-config.json (1 hunks)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (2e64eca) to head (968a960).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #1778   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines           53        53           
  Branches         7         7           
=========================================
  Hits            53        53           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

ktgowtham
ktgowtham previously approved these changes Nov 11, 2024
@achettyiitr achettyiitr force-pushed the chore.snowpipe-streaming-category branch from 3a9bea4 to 968a960 Compare November 13, 2024 08:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants