chore: refactor workflows #1643
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
WalkthroughThe recent updates encompass a broad refinement of GitHub workflows and configurations, aiming to enhance deployment processes, job handling, and environment setups. Notable changes include renaming workflows for clarity, transitioning to self-hosted Linux X64 environments, refining AWS and Slack integrations, and updating Node.js versions. Additionally, adjustments in naming conventions, job triggers, and branch handling reflect a push towards more streamlined and efficient CI/CD pipelines. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1643 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 52.44% 52.44%
========================================
Files 584 584
Lines 16662 16662
Branches 3235 3234 -1
========================================
Hits 8738 8738
Misses 6535 6535
Partials 1389 1389 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (16)
- .github/workflows/check_pr_title.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/create-hotfix-branch.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-beta.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-dev.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-npm.yml (5 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-prod.yml (6 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-sanity-suite.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-staging.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/draft-new-release.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/housekeeping.yaml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/publish-new-release.yml (5 hunks)
- .github/workflows/rollback.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/security-code-quality-and-bundle-size-checks.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/unit-tests-and-lint.yml (3 hunks)
- .nvmrc (1 hunks)
- CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .nvmrc
Additional comments: 63
.github/workflows/check_pr_title.yml (3)
- 1-1: Renaming the workflow to "Check PR Title" improves clarity and consistency with other workflow names. Good practice for maintainability.
- 5-5: Adjusting the branches that trigger the workflow to include
main,develop, andhotfix/*ensures that PR titles are checked across all critical branches. This is a positive change for ensuring consistency in PR titles.- 11-11: Switching to a self-hosted Linux X64 machine for running the job could improve performance and control over the CI environment. Ensure that the self-hosted runner is properly configured and has the necessary dependencies for this workflow.
.github/workflows/create-hotfix-branch.yml (3)
- 1-1: Updating the workflow name to "Create a new hotfix branch" clarifies the workflow's purpose. This is a positive change for maintainability and clarity.
- 13-13: Running the workflow on a self-hosted Linux X64 environment could offer better performance and control. Ensure the self-hosted runner is properly configured for this task.
- 21-21: The new branch naming convention
hotfix/${{ github.event.inputs.hotfix_name }}is clear and consistent with common practices for hotfix branches. This change should help in organizing and identifying hotfix branches more easily..github/workflows/rollback.yml (4)
- 1-1: Introducing a "Rollback Production Deployment" workflow is a significant addition for managing deployment issues. This workflow provides a structured approach to rolling back changes in production environments.
- 6-8: Setting specific permissions for the workflow, such as
id-token: writeandcontents: read, is a good practice for following the principle of least privilege. Ensure these permissions align with the requirements of the actions used in this workflow.- 16-16: The conditional
if: startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v') || startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/heads/main')ensures that the rollback is only performed for tags starting withvor the main branch. This is a sensible safeguard, but ensure it aligns with the project's versioning and branching strategy.- 17-17: Using the
.github/workflows/deploy-prod.ymlworkflow withaction_type: ' Rollback'for rolling back deployments is an innovative approach. Ensure that thedeploy-prod.ymlworkflow is correctly configured to handle theaction_typeparameter and perform the rollback as expected..github/workflows/housekeeping.yaml (4)
- 1-1: Renaming the workflow to "Handle Stale PRs and Branches" clearly communicates its purpose. This is a positive change for clarity and maintainability.
- 5-5: Adjusting the schedule to run the cleanup job every day at 00:01 is a reasonable frequency for managing stale PRs and branches. Ensure this frequency aligns with the project's activity level and housekeeping needs.
- 21-21: The updated message for stale PRs is clear and provides actionable advice for contributors. This change should help in managing stale PRs more effectively by encouraging activity or closure.
- 40-40: The addition of
extra_protected_branch_regexandexclude_open_pr_branchesoptions in the branch cleanup step is a good practice for preventing accidental deletion of important branches and those associated with open PRs. Ensure the regex correctly captures all branches that should be protected..github/workflows/unit-tests-and-lint.yml (3)
- 1-1: Renaming the workflow to "Unit Tests and Lint" simplifies and clarifies its purpose. This is a positive change for clarity and maintainability.
- 8-8: Adjusting the branches that trigger the workflow to include
hotfix/*ensures that unit tests and lint checks are run for all critical branches. This is a positive change for maintaining code quality across the codebase.- 41-47: Adding a step to upload coverage reports to Codecov before the linting check step is executed is a good practice for ensuring code coverage is reviewed as part of the CI process. Ensure that the specified files match the project's coverage report outputs.
.github/workflows/security-code-quality-and-bundle-size-checks.yml (4)
- 1-1: Renaming the workflow to "Security, Code Quality and Bundle Size Checks" clearly communicates its expanded scope. This is a positive change for clarity and maintainability.
- 5-5: Adjusting the branches that trigger the workflow to include
hotfix/*ensures that checks are run for all critical branches. This is a positive change for maintaining security and code quality across the codebase.- 1-17: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [12-36]
Separating bundle size checks into their own job within the workflow is a good practice for modularity and clarity. Ensure that the configuration for the bundle size checks is correctly set up to meet the project's requirements.
- 37-64: Creating a distinct job for security and code quality checks enhances the workflow's clarity and modularity. Ensure that the steps within this job are correctly configured to perform the intended checks effectively.
.github/workflows/draft-new-release.yml (5)
- 1-1: Renaming the workflow to "Draft a new release" simplifies and clarifies its purpose. This is a positive change for clarity and maintainability.
- 12-12: Running the job on a self-hosted Linux X64 environment could offer better performance and control. Ensure the self-hosted runner is properly configured for this task.
- 13-13: Updating the conditional logic for branch prefixes to include
hotfix/aligns with common branching strategies for hotfixes. Ensure this change is consistent with the project's versioning and release strategy.- 46-47: Adjusting the logic for determining the release type based on branch prefixes is a sensible approach. Ensure that the script correctly identifies and handles different release types.
- 103-103: Modifying the list of PR reviewers to include 'MoumitaM' and 'saikumarrs' reflects changes in project maintainers or ownership areas. Ensure that the new reviewers are prepared for their roles.
.github/workflows/deploy-dev.yml (4)
- 1-1: Renaming the workflow to "Deploy to Development Environment" clarifies its purpose. This is a positive change for clarity and maintainability.
- 19-19: Updating the job name to "Deploy to development environment" improves clarity. Ensure that the job configuration aligns with the deployment requirements for the development environment.
- 21-21: The updated conditions for job execution ensure that deployments to the development environment are triggered under appropriate circumstances. This change helps in maintaining a stable development environment.
- 69-82: Adding steps to create Cloudfront invalidations and synchronize legacy SDK files to S3 enhances the deployment process by ensuring that the latest changes are reflected and legacy SDK versions are maintained. Ensure that the paths and configurations are correctly set up for these operations.
.github/workflows/publish-new-release.yml (8)
- 1-1: The workflow name change to "Publish New Release to GitHub" is clear and descriptive.
- 15-16: Renaming the job to "Publish new release" and specifying a self-hosted runner on Linux X64 are appropriate updates for clarity and infrastructure specificity.
- 18-18: The conditional logic for triggering the job only on merged pull requests from
release/orhotfix-release/branches is a good practice for release management.- 54-54: Creating a monorepo release tag with the extracted version is a crucial step for version management. Ensure the tag format aligns with the project's versioning strategy.
- 72-72: Creating GitHub releases with dynamic base and head versions is a good practice for maintaining release history and documentation.
- 86-88: Updating the PR title and reviewers in the "Create pull request into develop" step helps maintain clarity and accountability in the release process.
- 92-94: The conditional logic for deleting hotfix release branches is a good housekeeping practice to keep the repository clean.
- 100-102: Similarly, the conditional logic for deleting release branches after merging is a good practice for repository maintenance.
.github/workflows/deploy-staging.yml (8)
- 1-1: Renaming the workflow to "Deploy to Staging Environment" improves clarity and specificity.
- 5-10: Adding a trigger for pull requests on the main branch with specific types (
opened,synchronize,reopened) is a good practice for ensuring staging deployments are triggered by relevant PR activities.- 21-25: The updated conditional logic for workflow execution based on branch names (
refs/tags/v,refs/heads/hotfix-release,refs/heads/release) ensures that deployments are correctly triggered for relevant branches.- 31-31: Configuring AWS credentials with a role to assume is crucial for secure access to AWS resources during the deployment process.
- 63-67: Specifying the
BUGSNAG_RELEASE_STAGEas 'staging' in the environment variables for the build steps is important for accurate error tracking and monitoring in the staging environment.- 72-79: The steps for syncing files to S3 for different SDK versions and folders are well-defined. Ensure that the AWS S3 bucket names and paths are correctly configured to prevent accidental overwrites or misplacements.
- 82-82: Creating a Cloudfront invalidation for the v3 staging folder is necessary to ensure that the latest changes are immediately reflected to end-users.
- 90-96: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [84-96]
The steps for syncing files and creating Cloudfront invalidations for the v1.1 SDK (legacy) are correctly implemented. This ensures that both the modern and legacy versions of the SDK are updated in the staging environment.
.github/workflows/deploy-beta.yml (5)
- 1-1: Renaming the workflow to "Deploy BETA/BugBash Feature" is concise and clearly communicates the purpose of the workflow.
- 23-27: Configuring AWS credentials with the appropriate role and region is essential for secure and correct access to AWS resources during the deployment process.
- 71-78: The steps for syncing files to the S3 beta directory are well-defined. It's important to ensure that the paths and bucket names are correctly configured to avoid conflicts with production assets.
- 79-81: Creating a Cloudfront invalidation for the beta or bugbash features ensures that the latest changes are immediately available for testing.
- 84-90: Syncing files for the v1.1 SDK (legacy) to the S3 beta directory and creating a Cloudfront invalidation are important steps for ensuring that legacy versions are also available for beta testing.
.github/workflows/deploy-npm.yml (4)
- 1-1: Renaming the workflow to "Deploy to NPM" simplifies the name while maintaining clarity about its purpose.
- 19-20: Updating the job to run on a self-hosted Linux X64 environment is a good practice for ensuring consistency and control over the deployment environment.
- 103-115: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [106-132]
Sending a Slack message for the Service Worker NPM package deployment with dynamic package versions and URLs is a good practice for keeping the team informed about new releases.
- 129-147: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [138-164]
Similarly, sending a Slack message for the v1.1 NPM package deployment ensures that all relevant stakeholders are notified about the release, promoting transparency and collaboration.
.github/workflows/deploy-prod.yml (8)
- 1-1: Renaming the workflow to "Deploy to Production Environment" enhances clarity and specificity, aligning with best practices for naming CI/CD workflows.
- 4-26: Updating the event trigger to
workflow_callwith additional input parameters and secrets is a significant improvement, allowing for more flexible and secure workflow executions.- 43-43: The updated conditional logic for the
deploy-tagjob, including the new event trigger condition, ensures that deployments are correctly triggered under the intended circumstances.- 49-49: Configuring AWS credentials with the specified role is crucial for secure access to AWS resources during the deployment process. This step is correctly implemented.
- 90-96: Syncing Adobe Analytics assets to S3 and creating a Cloudfront invalidation are important steps for ensuring that analytics assets are updated and available in the production environment.
- 102-110: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [106-117]
Creating Cloudfront invalidations for both the v3 folder and versioned folders ensures that the latest changes are immediately reflected to end-users, which is crucial for a production environment.
- 172-198: Syncing files for the v1.1 SDK (legacy) to both versioned and unversioned folders, and creating Cloudfront invalidations, ensures that legacy versions are also updated and available in the production environment.
- 202-214: Creating a Cloudfront invalidation for the '/latest' folder (v1.1) is necessary to ensure that the latest changes are immediately available. However, as mentioned earlier, the usage of the '/latest' folder should be evaluated for relevance and necessity.
size-limit report 📦
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/check_pr_title.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/check_pr_title.yml
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/publish-new-release.yml (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/publish-new-release.yml
MoumitaM
requested changes
Mar 13, 2024
MoumitaM
approved these changes
Mar 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Description
v3-prefixed branches.See the "Summary by CodeRabbit" section below for more details.
Linear task (optional)
https://linear.app/rudderstack/issue/SDK-1415/refactor-github-actions-js-sdk
Cross Browser Tests
Please confirm you have tested for the following browsers:
Sanity Suite
Security
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit