feat: Add Dhall support #466
Conversation
|
@matthiasbeyer since this original PR was stale from about 2 years ago, does anything look like adjustments are needed? In the tests I can see it's missing the enum settings file like all other config types seem to have coverage for. Should that be addressed? I probably should version bump the new dependencies added too? |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
src/file/format/dhall.rs
Outdated
| serde_dhall::SimpleValue::Num(num) => match num { | ||
| serde_dhall::NumKind::Bool(b) => Value::new(uri, ValueKind::Boolean(b)), | ||
| serde_dhall::NumKind::Natural(n) => Value::new(uri, ValueKind::Integer(n as i64)), | ||
| serde_dhall::NumKind::Integer(i) => Value::new(uri, ValueKind::Integer(i)), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TOML seems to rely on inference while others are more explicitly typing to ValueKind::I64(value), should I go with the latter?
Cargo.toml
Outdated
| @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ yaml-rust = { version = "0.4", optional = true } | |||
| rust-ini = { version = "0.19", optional = true } | |||
| ron = { version = "0.8", optional = true } | |||
| json5_rs = { version = "0.4", optional = true, package = "json5" } | |||
| serde_dhall = { version = "0.10", optional = true } | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| serde_dhall = { version = "0.10", optional = true } | |
| serde_dhall = { version = "0.12", optional = true } |
Note this status update from June 2023:
https://github.com/Nadrieril/dhall-rust#status
I am no longer maintaining this project.
I got it to support about 90% of the language but then lost faith in the usability of dhall for my purposes
- Only 1 other user has 👍 the original issue (Nov 2019) requesting Dhall support: Format request: Dhall #123
- The original PR (July 2021) itself was left stale for about 2 years, with the author no longer interested pursuing it.
- The original issue author also expressed a loss of interest in Dhall (March 2021).
- I personally have no interest in the config format myself. I just thought I'd help avoid a feature PR from going stale 😅
Given the above, perhaps Dhall should not be merged into config-rs? The lack of upstream maintenance and demand doesn't seem to justify any additional maintenance burden it may offload onto config-rs project?
src/file/format/dhall.rs
Outdated
| let value = from_dhall_value(uri, serde_dhall::from_str(text).parse()?); | ||
| match value.kind { | ||
| ValueKind::Table(map) => Ok(map), | ||
| ValueKind::Nil => Err(Unexpected::Unit), | ||
| ValueKind::Boolean(value) => Err(Unexpected::Bool(value)), | ||
| ValueKind::Integer(value) => Err(Unexpected::Integer(value)), | ||
| ValueKind::Float(value) => Err(Unexpected::Float(value)), | ||
| ValueKind::String(value) => Err(Unexpected::Str(value)), | ||
| ValueKind::Array(value) => Err(Unexpected::Seq), | ||
| } | ||
| .map_err(|err| ConfigError::invalid_root(uri, err)) | ||
| .map_err(|err| Box::new(err) as Box<dyn Error + Send + Sync>) |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Signed-off-by: Brennan Kinney <[email protected]>
- fix: `HashMap` => `Map` to avoid compilation error Original author: MGlolenstine - fix: `Integer` => `I64` `ValueKind` enum has changed since the original PR went stale. - chore: Version bump `serde_dhall` to `0.12` Signed-off-by: Brennan Kinney <[email protected]>
polarathene
force-pushed
the
add-dhall-support
branch
from
7a4bcaa
to
35a8b56
Compare
Yes, depending on an unmaintained implementation is definitively something we shouldn't rely on, sorry. |
|
FWIW, it seems that the yaml support has become unmaintained, no commits since July 2021. The developer doesn't have much activity on Github (last active Sep 2022). |
Rebased #218 with conflicts resolved. All credit to @sphw for the actual contribution.
This PR adds Dhall support using serde_dhall, a native Rust implementation of Dhall. Dhall is a functional configuration language designed to make composition of configuration files easier.
Closes #123