Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make USB device config public #69

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nickray
Copy link
Contributor

@nickray nickray commented May 9, 2021

I was about to start tackling USB/IP when I discovered @Sawchord's https://github.com/Sawchord/usbip-device.

For usbip list -r localhost to be somewhat pretty, the USB/IP server should return basic info on the device, which duplicates the contents of the non-public Config struct here. (It's not strictly necessary for this info to be correct, AFAIU.)

Looking at UsbDeviceBuilder, in reality it's a ConfigBuilder, which would become quite redundant (candidate for deprecation?) if the config itself were made public with a fluent/builder interface. I'm gambling on increasing merge/publish potential by staying backwards compatible though :)

This would then allow re-use in the USB/IP driver (e.g. https://github.com/nickray/usbip-device/blob/7bab96f64072da82a552c94213b5dc98f2481c99/examples/twitching_mouse.rs#L16-L26)

There's a bit chicken+egg involved regarding DRY and the interface descriptors (which USB/IP also advertises); solving that seems it would require breaking changes which I don't want to propose.

P.S. Are there any/many useful cases for Config<'a> with non-'static lifetimes?

Comment on lines +18 to +47
pub struct Config<'a> {
/// USB device class
pub device_class: u8,
/// USB device subclass
pub device_sub_class: u8,
/// USB device protocol
pub device_protocol: u8,
/// USB control endpoint maximum packet size
pub max_packet_size_0: u8,
/// USB vendor ID
pub vendor_id: u16,
/// USB product ID
pub product_id: u16,
/// BCD encoded device release
pub device_release: u16,
/// Manufacturer string
pub manufacturer: Option<&'a str>,
/// Product string
pub product: Option<&'a str>,
/// Serial number
pub serial_number: Option<&'a str>,
/// Is device self-powered?
pub self_powered: bool,
/// Does device support remote wakeup?
pub supports_remote_wakeup: bool,
/// Is device composite with IADs?
pub composite_with_iads: bool,
/// Maximum power consumption of device
pub max_power: u8,
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As much as I like the builder semantics, making struct fields public is problematic . See https://rust-lang.github.io/api-guidelines/future-proofing.html#structs-have-private-fields-c-struct-private for a discussion on why this is problematic for a maintainability perspective.

Other than that, I like the builder config API

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants