Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow Q: ?Sized in Itertools::contains #971

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2024

Conversation

Alexendoo
Copy link
Contributor

To enable .contains("foo") on an Iterator<Item = String> and similar

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.32%. Comparing base (6814180) to head (ccd68d2).
Report is 111 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #971      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.38%   94.32%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          48       49       +1     
  Lines        6665     6708      +43     
==========================================
+ Hits         6291     6327      +36     
- Misses        374      381       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@phimuemue phimuemue left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.

@phimuemue phimuemue added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into rust-itertools:master with commit a20444f Jul 12, 2024
14 checks passed
@Alexendoo Alexendoo deleted the contains-sized branch July 12, 2024 19:36
@Philippe-Cholet Philippe-Cholet added this to the next milestone Jul 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants