fix: minor typo in chapter 17 documentation

[MathRdt]

No description provided.

[neurolag]

There's one more in this chapter here:

book/nostarch/chapter17.md

Line 2718 in b21ad61

That’s a lot to absorb! To really understand it, let’s we dive a little further

I think it might make sense to fix this typo in this PR as well.

[MathRdt]

There's one more in this chapter here:

book/nostarch/chapter17.md

Line 2718 in b21ad61

That’s a lot to absorb! To really understand it, let’s we dive a little further

I think it might make sense to fix this typo in this PR as well.

You are right, This sentence seemed weird to me too, but, as english is not my native language, I didn't know if this was a valid sentence or not.
I removed the "we" to reformulate it in a more obvious way.

[neurolag]

We're in the same boat, then, I guess
but I'm 90% sure it's a typo.

[nixxo]

Regarding the WE "typo", the author of the book is telling the student, "we are doing this thing together...". Without the WE is correct as well, just a little more informal. It's not a typo, imho, just a personal touch from the author of the sentence.

The second one I agree is a typo.

[neurolag]

aaah fair - I wasn't exactly sure "let us we" is proper English

[carols10cents]

Hi, sorry, the files in the nostarch directory aren't what's used for the book-- they're snapshots at a particular point in time that correspond to the print versions, as explained in the comment at the top of the file you edited. This was fixed in the src versions in ba1646d but I hadn't updated the snapshot. Thanks though!