refactor: compiler invocations#12211
Merged
bors merged 7 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom May 31, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
r? @ehuss (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
A-build-execution
Apparently it was a bit confusing where `rustflags` is from when reading this piece of code.
weihanglo
force-pushed
the
refactor-compiler-invocation
branch
from
d21e8a8 to
5256dec
Compare
epage
reviewed
May 31, 2023
epage
reviewed
May 31, 2023
weihanglo
force-pushed
the
refactor-compiler-invocation
branch
from
5256dec to
fb92ee5
Compare
epage
reviewed
May 31, 2023
| " | ||
| ) | ||
| .with_stdout_does_not_contain("[..] -C debuginfo=0[..]") | ||
| .with_stderr_does_not_contain("[..] -C debuginfo=0[..]") |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If these tests were testing the wrong thing, should that be its own commit?
This is also why I don't like testing for something not existing...
epage
reviewed
May 31, 2023
| [RUNNING] `rustc --crate-name bar bar/src/lib.rs [..]--crate-type dylib \ | ||
| --emit=[..]link \ | ||
| -C prefer-dynamic[..]-C debuginfo=2 \ | ||
| -C prefer-dynamic[..]-C debuginfo=2 [..]\ |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
It was unnecessary to pass `spilt-debuginfo` if there is no debuginfo. Tests are touched here only for matching rustflags invocation stderr in the original test suite.
This is for linker arguments from build scripts, so should live there.
Make it clear by separating static and dynamic rustflags.
Make it clear by separating static and dynamic rustdocflags.
This was an overlook in rust-lang#12205
weihanglo
force-pushed
the
refactor-compiler-invocation
branch
from
fb92ee5 to
d4067e4
Compare
Contributor
|
@bors r+ |
Contributor
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Contributor
Contributor
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2023
Update cargo 14 commits in f7b95e31642e09c2b6eabb18ed75007dda6677a0..b0fa79679e717cd077b7fc0fa4166f47107f1ba9 2023-05-30 19:25:02 +0000 to 2023-06-03 14:19:48 +0000 - Emit error when users try to use a toolchain via the `add` or `install` command (rust-lang/cargo#12226) - Support "default" option for `build.jobs` (rust-lang/cargo#12222) - Fix typo in changelog (rust-lang/cargo#12227) - chore: Sort `-Z` flags match statement (rust-lang/cargo#12223) - Update curl-sys (rust-lang/cargo#12218) - Bump to 0.73.0; update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#12219) - refactor: housekeeping for 1.70.0 (rust-lang/cargo#12217) - nit: fix typo in changelog for 1.70 (rust-lang/cargo#12215) - Remove a noop `.clone` (rust-lang/cargo#12213) - refactor: compiler invocations (rust-lang/cargo#12211) - cargo clean: use `remove_dir_all` (rust-lang/cargo#11442) - Add a small note about indexes ignoring SemVer build metadata. (rust-lang/cargo#12206) - Revert "chore: detect the channel a PR wants to merge into" (rust-lang/cargo#12204) - Don't distinguish `Debuginfo::None` and `Debuginfo::Explicit(None)` (rust-lang/cargo#12205) r? `@ghost`
RalfJung
pushed a commit
to RalfJung/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2023
Update cargo 14 commits in f7b95e31642e09c2b6eabb18ed75007dda6677a0..b0fa79679e717cd077b7fc0fa4166f47107f1ba9 2023-05-30 19:25:02 +0000 to 2023-06-03 14:19:48 +0000 - Emit error when users try to use a toolchain via the `add` or `install` command (rust-lang/cargo#12226) - Support "default" option for `build.jobs` (rust-lang/cargo#12222) - Fix typo in changelog (rust-lang/cargo#12227) - chore: Sort `-Z` flags match statement (rust-lang/cargo#12223) - Update curl-sys (rust-lang/cargo#12218) - Bump to 0.73.0; update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#12219) - refactor: housekeeping for 1.70.0 (rust-lang/cargo#12217) - nit: fix typo in changelog for 1.70 (rust-lang/cargo#12215) - Remove a noop `.clone` (rust-lang/cargo#12213) - refactor: compiler invocations (rust-lang/cargo#12211) - cargo clean: use `remove_dir_all` (rust-lang/cargo#11442) - Add a small note about indexes ignoring SemVer build metadata. (rust-lang/cargo#12206) - Revert "chore: detect the channel a PR wants to merge into" (rust-lang/cargo#12204) - Don't distinguish `Debuginfo::None` and `Debuginfo::Explicit(None)` (rust-lang/cargo#12205) r? `@ghost`
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
Found some places needing minor refactors during reviewing #12205
How should we test and review this PR?
Commit by commit. Each has its own explanation.
The first four shouldn't be controversial. However, we need people to scrutinize the last two. All static rustflags additions were moved into a single functions. This shouldn't have any behavior change.
Additional information
After this, I'll do a follow-up to extract flags building process. It is expected to make it clearer and safer for building static and dynamic flags.