Always inline incremental_verify_ich

[Zoxc]

This is another attempt at reducing the regression in #109333.

r? @cjgillot

[compiler-errors]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit fce3ce6 with merge 751484ee84316be914277ed18f2a57bbac93d9a2...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 751484ee84316be914277ed18f2a57bbac93d9a2 (751484ee84316be914277ed18f2a57bbac93d9a2)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (751484ee84316be914277ed18f2a57bbac93d9a2): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.7%	[0.5%, 0.9%]	4
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.7%	[3.7%, 3.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-0.9%, -0.6%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-0.9%, 0.9%]	7

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.5%	[0.4%, 0.5%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.5%	[0.4%, 0.5%]	2