-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #130854
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 5 pull requests #130854
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Currently constants are "pulled forward" and have their stack spills emitted first. This confuses LLVM as to where to place breakpoints at function entry, and results in argument values being wrong in the debugger. It's straightforward to avoid emitting the stack spills for constants until arguments/etc have been introduced in debug_introduce_locals, so do that. Example LLVM IR (irrelevant IR elided): Before: define internal void @_ZN11rust_1289457binding17h2c78f956ba4bd2c3E(i64 %a, i64 %b, double %c) unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !178 { start: %c.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %b.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %a.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %x.dbg.spill = alloca [4 x i8], align 4 store i32 0, ptr %x.dbg.spill, align 4, !dbg !192 ; LLVM places breakpoint here. #dbg_declare(ptr %x.dbg.spill, !190, !DIExpression(), !192) store i64 %a, ptr %a.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %a.dbg.spill, !187, !DIExpression(), !193) store i64 %b, ptr %b.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %b.dbg.spill, !188, !DIExpression(), !194) store double %c, ptr %c.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %c.dbg.spill, !189, !DIExpression(), !195) ret void, !dbg !196 } After: define internal void @_ZN11rust_1289457binding17h2c78f956ba4bd2c3E(i64 %a, i64 %b, double %c) unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !178 { start: %x.dbg.spill = alloca [4 x i8], align 4 %c.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %b.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %a.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 store i64 %a, ptr %a.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %a.dbg.spill, !187, !DIExpression(), !192) store i64 %b, ptr %b.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %b.dbg.spill, !188, !DIExpression(), !193) store double %c, ptr %c.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %c.dbg.spill, !189, !DIExpression(), !194) store i32 0, ptr %x.dbg.spill, align 4, !dbg !195 ; LLVM places breakpoint here. #dbg_declare(ptr %x.dbg.spill, !190, !DIExpression(), !195) ret void, !dbg !196 } Note in particular the position of the "LLVM places breakpoint here" comment relative to the stack spills for the function arguments. LLVM assumes that the first instruction with with a debug location is the end of the prologue. As LLVM does not currently offer front ends any direct control over the placement of the prologue end reordering the IR is the only mechanism available to fix argument values at function entry in the presence of MIR optimizations like SingleUseConsts. Fixes rust-lang#128945
update tests fix bitwidth-sensitive stderr output use build-fail for asm tests
Implement RFC3137 trim-paths sysroot changes - take 2 This PR is a continuation of rust-lang#118149. Nothing really changed, except for rust-lang#129408 which I was able to trigger locally. Original description: > Implement parts of rust-lang#111540 > > Right now, backtraces into sysroot always shows /rustc/$hash in diagnostics, e.g. > > ``` > thread 'main' panicked at 'hello world', map-panic.rs:2:50 > stack backtrace: > 0: std::panicking::begin_panic > at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/std/src/panicking.rs:616:12 > 1: map_panic::main::{{closure}} > at ./map-panic.rs:2:50 > 2: core::option::Option<T>::map > at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/option.rs:929:29 > 3: map_panic::main > at ./map-panic.rs:2:30 > 4: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once > at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:248:5 > note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace. > ``` > > [RFC 3127 said](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3127-trim-paths.html#changing-handling-of-sysroot-path-in-rustc) > > > We want to change this behaviour such that, when rust-src source files can be discovered, the virtual path is discarded and therefore the local path will be embedded, unless there is a --remap-path-prefix that causes this local path to be remapped in the usual way. > > This PR implements this behaviour. When `rust-src` is present at compile time, rustc replaces /rustc/$hash with a real path into local rust-src with best effort. To sanitise this, users must explicitly supply `--remap-path-prefix=<path to rust-src>=foo`. cc `@cbeuw` Fix rust-lang#105907 Fix rust-lang#85463 try-job: dist-x86_64-linux try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: armhf-gnu
…efs-to-static, r=RalfJung Stabilize `const_refs_to_static` Meanwhile, I am cooking a sub-section in the language reference.
…avidtwco Reorder stack spills so that constants come later. Currently constants are "pulled forward" and have their stack spills emitted first. This confuses LLVM as to where to place breakpoints at function entry, and results in argument values being wrong in the debugger. It's straightforward to avoid emitting the stack spills for constants until arguments/etc have been introduced in debug_introduce_locals, so do that. Example LLVM IR (irrelevant IR elided): Before: ``` define internal void `@_ZN11rust_1289457binding17h2c78f956ba4bd2c3E(i64` %a, i64 %b, double %c) unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !178 { start: %c.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %b.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %a.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %x.dbg.spill = alloca [4 x i8], align 4 store i32 0, ptr %x.dbg.spill, align 4, !dbg !192 ; LLVM places breakpoint here. #dbg_declare(ptr %x.dbg.spill, !190, !DIExpression(), !192) store i64 %a, ptr %a.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %a.dbg.spill, !187, !DIExpression(), !193) store i64 %b, ptr %b.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %b.dbg.spill, !188, !DIExpression(), !194) store double %c, ptr %c.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %c.dbg.spill, !189, !DIExpression(), !195) ret void, !dbg !196 } ``` After: ``` define internal void `@_ZN11rust_1289457binding17h2c78f956ba4bd2c3E(i64` %a, i64 %b, double %c) unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !178 { start: %x.dbg.spill = alloca [4 x i8], align 4 %c.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %b.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %a.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 store i64 %a, ptr %a.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %a.dbg.spill, !187, !DIExpression(), !192) store i64 %b, ptr %b.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %b.dbg.spill, !188, !DIExpression(), !193) store double %c, ptr %c.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %c.dbg.spill, !189, !DIExpression(), !194) store i32 0, ptr %x.dbg.spill, align 4, !dbg !195 ; LLVM places breakpoint here. #dbg_declare(ptr %x.dbg.spill, !190, !DIExpression(), !195) ret void, !dbg !196 } ``` Note in particular the position of the "LLVM places breakpoint here" comment relative to the stack spills for the function arguments. LLVM assumes that the first instruction with with a debug location is the end of the prologue. As LLVM does not currently offer front ends any direct control over the placement of the prologue end reordering the IR is the only mechanism available to fix argument values at function entry in the presence of MIR optimizations like SingleUseConsts. Fixes rust-lang#128945 r? `@michaelwoerister`
Utf8Chunks: add link to Utf8Chunk It is currently surprisingly non-trivial to go from the `utf8_chunks` method to the docs of the `valid`/`invalid` methods used in the example. This should help.
Revert Break into the debugger on panic (129019) This was talked about a bit at a recent libs meeting. While I think experimenting with this is worthwhile, I am nervous about this new behaviour reaching stable. We've already reverted on one tier 1 platform (Linux, rust-lang#130810) which means we have differing semantics on different tier 1 platforms. Also the fact it triggers even when `catch_unwind` is used to catch the panic means it can be very noisy in some projects. At the very least I think it could use some more discussion before being instantly stable. I think this could maybe be re-landed with an environment variable to control/override the behaviour. But that part would likely need a libs-api decision. cc `@workingjubilee` `@kromych`
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Sep 25, 2024
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Sep 25, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#129687 (Implement RFC3137 trim-paths sysroot changes - take 2) - rust-lang#129759 (Stabilize `const_refs_to_static`) - rust-lang#130329 (Reorder stack spills so that constants come later.) - rust-lang#130845 (Utf8Chunks: add link to Utf8Chunk) - rust-lang#130846 (Revert Break into the debugger on panic (129019)) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
const_refs_to_static
#129759 (Stabilizeconst_refs_to_static
)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup