-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
Port #[rustc_has_incoherent_inherent_impls] to attribute parser
#150942
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_hir/src/attrs Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #148941 (stabilize `Peekable::next_if_map` (`#![feature(peekable_next_if_map)]`)) - #150368 (adding Ordering enum to minicore.rs, importing minicore in "tests/assembly-llvm/rust-abi-arg-attr.rs" test file) - #150668 (Unix implementation for stdio set/take/replace) - #150743 (Reword the collect() docs) - #150776 (Fix the connect_error test on FreeBSD 15+) - #150781 (Use `rand` crate more idiomatically) - #150812 (Bump `diesel` to the most recent commit in `cargotest`) - #150862 (std: sys: fs: uefi: Implement File::flush) - #150873 (Reenable GCC CI download) - #150908 (llvm: Update `reliable_f16` configuration for LLVM22) - #150918 (std: sys: fs: uefi: Implement File::seek) - #150922 (Subscribe myself to attr parsing) - #150930 (Remove special case for `AllowedTargets::CrateLevel`) - #150942 (Port `#[rustc_has_incoherent_inherent_impls]` to attribute parser) Failed merges: - #150943 (Port `#[must_not_suspend]` to attribute parser) r? @ghost
Rollup merge of #150942 - port_more_attrs, r=jdonszelmann Port `#[rustc_has_incoherent_inherent_impls]` to attribute parser Tracking issue: #131229 no tests changed here at all, so maybe we should add some but would like to know what kind of tests would be good to add r? @JonathanBrouwer
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#148941 (stabilize `Peekable::next_if_map` (`#![feature(peekable_next_if_map)]`)) - rust-lang/rust#150368 (adding Ordering enum to minicore.rs, importing minicore in "tests/assembly-llvm/rust-abi-arg-attr.rs" test file) - rust-lang/rust#150668 (Unix implementation for stdio set/take/replace) - rust-lang/rust#150743 (Reword the collect() docs) - rust-lang/rust#150776 (Fix the connect_error test on FreeBSD 15+) - rust-lang/rust#150781 (Use `rand` crate more idiomatically) - rust-lang/rust#150812 (Bump `diesel` to the most recent commit in `cargotest`) - rust-lang/rust#150862 (std: sys: fs: uefi: Implement File::flush) - rust-lang/rust#150873 (Reenable GCC CI download) - rust-lang/rust#150908 (llvm: Update `reliable_f16` configuration for LLVM22) - rust-lang/rust#150918 (std: sys: fs: uefi: Implement File::seek) - rust-lang/rust#150922 (Subscribe myself to attr parsing) - rust-lang/rust#150930 (Remove special case for `AllowedTargets::CrateLevel`) - rust-lang/rust#150942 (Port `#[rustc_has_incoherent_inherent_impls]` to attribute parser) Failed merges: - rust-lang/rust#150943 (Port `#[must_not_suspend]` to attribute parser) r? @ghost
|
@rust-timer build 40856d8 cc #150957 (comment), original perf results |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (40856d8): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -4.8%, secondary -0.6%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (secondary -6.7%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 474.227s -> 472.158s (-0.44%) |
Tracking issue: #131229
no tests changed here at all, so maybe we should add some but would like to know what kind of tests would be good to add
r? @JonathanBrouwer