Rollup of 8 pull requests#152094
Closed
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 20 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Closed
Conversation
…stom target specs This also takes the chance to move forward the job to Linux v6.19-rc7, thus the previous workaround is not needed anymore. Link: rust-lang#151534 Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Extend CI postprocessing to aggregate pass/fail/ignored counts for debuginfo tests. Tests are identified via their reported suite names (e.g. debuginfo-gdb, debuginfo-lldb or debuginfo-cdb). Signed-off-by: Usman Akinyemi <usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com>
To match the opening `(` before the reference to PR 127786
…json-again, r=chenyukang target: fix destabilising target-spec-json cc rust-lang#151528 rust-lang#150151 missed a case and didn't entirely destabilise target-spec-json - this patch corrects that. Closes rust-lang#71009
rustbook/README.md: add missing `)` To match the opening `(` before the reference to PR 127786
… r=oli-obk Fix autodiff codegen tests Preparing autodiff for release on nightly. Since we haven't been running these tests in CI, they regressed over the last months. These changes fixes this and hopefully make the tests more robust for the future. r? compiler
…obzol citool: report debuginfo test statistics Extend CI postprocessing to aggregate pass/fail/ignored counts for debuginfo tests. Tests are identified via their reported suite names (e.g. debuginfo-gdb, debuginfo-lldb or debuginfo-cdb).
…r=lqd Convert to inline diagnostics in `rustc_ty_utils` For rust-lang#151366 r? @jdonszelmann
…=jdonszelmann Convert to inline diagnostics in `rustc_session` For rust-lang#151366 r? @jdonszelmann
…=lqd Convert to inline diagnostics in `rustc_privacy` For rust-lang#151366 r? @jdonszelmann
…ze, r=jdonszelmann Convert to inline diagnostics in `rustc_monomorphize` For rust-lang#151366 r? @jdonszelmann
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
Contributor
Contributor
Author
|
Honestly still 50/50 whether this rollup will conflict with the currently running one with all the diagnostic prs in here, I'll re-make the rollup quickly if it ends up conflicting |
Contributor
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #152089) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. This pull request was unapproved. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
)#152088 (rustbook/README.md: add missing))rustc_ty_utils#152065 (Convert to inline diagnostics inrustc_ty_utils)rustc_session#152066 (Convert to inline diagnostics inrustc_session)rustc_privacy#152069 (Convert to inline diagnostics inrustc_privacy)rustc_monomorphize#152072 (Convert to inline diagnostics inrustc_monomorphize)r? @ghost
Create a similar rollup