feat: template-only components! #5669
Draft
+80
−54
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lpomerleau
reviewed
Jan 9, 2026
| scoped, | ||
| specifier: params.get('specifier'), | ||
| scoped: params.has('scoped'), | ||
| templateOnlyEntry: params.get('template'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this null if there is a js or ts file for the component?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yep, it's only set for template-only HTML files
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Details
With this change, having a
.jsor.tsfile is no longer required for components. If a component only needs a template, then it can specify just an.htmlfile with no extra boilerplate.This is accomplished in the rollup plugin by detecting if a component's entrypoint is an
.htmlfile. If it is, then it injects a virtual JS file with the minimal boilerplate, which in turn implicitly imports the (real) HTML template.WIP testing: the playground no longer has
app.js, but it still works!Does this pull request introduce a breaking change?
Does this pull request introduce an observable change?
GUS work item