Skip to content

Conversation

@lucascolley
Copy link
Member

closes gh-29

@lucascolley lucascolley requested review from rgommers and steppi April 18, 2025 19:34
Co-authored-by: Albert Steppi <[email protected]>
@lucascolley
Copy link
Member Author

I guess the reason we don't need put anything here for amos and specfun is because they are public domain?

Not sure, but I don't think we have licenses for them bundled in SciPy

Co-authored-by: Albert Steppi <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@rgommers rgommers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That all looks correct to me, thanks for the quick fix!

@lucascolley
Copy link
Member Author

thanks for catching the typos Albert :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@steppi steppi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @lucascolley!

@steppi steppi merged commit 448fa80 into scipy:main Apr 18, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Licensing issues in this repository

3 participants