Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Resolve concurrency issues #834
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Resolve concurrency issues #834
Changes from 6 commits
b2ac745
6b6dd2d
66f6b7d
5296d46
5294b23
1ba7a9c
6ea11c2
0da185b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Gallaecio @alex-triphonov
would it be possible to keep the
settings=None
and, in case it's used, raise a deprecation warning and preserve the old behavior?Something like:
I know the code won't be nice, but I think in that way we could keep the backward compatibility until the next major version.
(You should do the same for
get_key()
and maybe something similar in the other two methods you touched).Maybe I'm saying something stupid, sorry guys, I didn't have too much time to play with the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No this is not possible- settings are still being used, but in kwargs for more convenience, the only way to separate behaviours is to add some new kwarg like
new_settings
but is old behaviour with fewerSettings
instances that much essential?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To me it’s mostly a matter of API. The current change would require to postpone this to dateparser 2.x, as it is backward incompatible. If we can figure a backward compatible implementation, this can go on the next dateparser version.