- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 129
Feature/support atomic append #346
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Open
      
      
            cortex-bt
  wants to merge
  13
  commits into
  serilog:dev
  
    
      
        
          
  
    
      Choose a base branch
      
     
    
      
        
      
      
        
          
          
        
        
          
            
              
              
              
  
           
        
        
          
            
              
              
           
        
       
     
  
        
          
            
          
            
          
        
       
    
      
from
cortex-bt:feature/support-atomic-append
  
      
      
   
  
    
  
  
  
 
  
      
    base: dev
Could not load branches
            
              
  
    Branch not found: {{ refName }}
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Could not load tags
            
            
              Nothing to show
            
              
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Are you sure you want to change the base?
            Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
            and old review comments may become outdated.
          
          
  
     Open
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            13 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      bb22663
              
                updated to use FileSystemAclExtensions.Create() to append to file
              
              
                cortex-bt 6cf1330
              
                added net7 as well
              
              
                cortex-bt ccd907b
              
                added to list
              
              
                cortex-bt af13b14
              
                removed net7 for now
              
              
                cortex-bt 3245d2f
              
                no need for checks
              
              
                cortex-bt 93f873f
              
                ensuring net6 uses os_mutex
              
              
                cortex-bt 4627ad3
              
                checking for platform required for .net8 to work
              
              
                cortex-bt 7691dcb
              
                creating new branch as we are only interested on .net8
              
              
                cortex-bt 89bc34f
              
                removed whitespace
              
              
                cortex-bt 6822f79
              
                added tests for atomic operations
              
              
                cortex-bt 7141e6d
              
                added tests for multiple users accessing file sink writes to
              
              
                cortex-bt c13bb1a
              
                simplified statements
              
              
                cortex-bt 8e7ba53
              
                shoulde be a == instead of !=
              
              
                cortex-bt File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will break
sharedflag support on non-Windows platforms; we'd need to fall back to the OS mutex variant in the non-Windows cases.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about reverting back to using new FileStream in the if statement for no windows platforms. So net8/9 would work with the CreateFile method while the rest still work as before using the FileStream ?
e.g
if (RuntimeInformation.IsOSPlatform(OSPlatform.Windows))
{
_fileOutput = CreateFile(
_path,
FileMode.Append,
FileSystemRights.AppendData,
FileShare.ReadWrite,
length,
FileOptions.None);
_fileStreamBufferLength = length;
}
else
{
_fileOutput = new FileStream(
_path,
FileMode.Append,
FileSystemRights.AppendData,
FileShare.ReadWrite,
length,
FileOptions.None);
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The OS mutex would still need to be used; the machinery around atomic append and the mutex ensure writes are not overlapping, which otherwise creates garbled logs when multiple processes share the same log file.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so then something like this in the csproj would be more appropriate
So for windows platforms it enables ATOMIC_APPEND and for non-Windows OS_MUTEX
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CSPROJ settings like that are applied at build time, but the same packaged
net8.0andnet9.0binaries need to run on both platforms. The example above would just make the package work only for the same OS as the build server.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you have any recommendations on how we could fall back to the OS mutex variant in the non-Windows cases? Or is this something that needs further planning?